IPR
Topic 09 Sources of Indian IP Law
Topic 9 — Sources of Indian Intellectual Property Law
Indian intellectual property law does not flow from a single source. It is the confluence of constitutional provisions that authorise Parliament to legislate, statutes that create the substantive rights, subordinate legislation that operationalises them, judicial decisions that interpret them, and international treaties that India has ratified. A judiciary candidate is expected to know not only the contents of the IP statutes but also the constitutional and international legal foundation on which they rest. This topic puts those layers in order.
The Hierarchy of Sources
Sources of Indian IP law arrange themselves in five concentric layers, from highest to most operational:
1 CONSTITUTION legislative competence | 2 TREATIES international obligations | 3 STATUTES substantive rights |
4 RULES subordinate legislation | 5 CASE LAW judicial interpretation |
1. Constitutional Sources
The Indian Constitution does not use the words "intellectual property", but legislative competence to enact every IP statute is traceable to the Seventh Schedule. The legislative power lies entirely with Parliament — IP is a Union subject.
Entry | List | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
Entry 49 | List I (Union) | Patents, inventions, designs; copyright; trade-marks and merchandise marks |
Entry 49A | List I (Union) | Geographical Indications (added by GI Act, 1999) |
Entry 13 | List I (Union) | Participation in international conferences and treaties — basis for ratifying TRIPS, WIPO conventions |
Entry 14 | List I (Union) | Entering into treaties and agreements with foreign countries and implementing them |
Article 245 | Part XI | Parliament's extent of legislative power |
Article 246 | Part XI | Subject-matter of laws made by Parliament — read with Schedule VII |
Article 253 | Part XI | Power of Parliament to make any law for implementing any treaty, agreement or convention |
✅ Why Article 253 matters for IP Article 253 is the constitutional doorway through which TRIPS, the Paris and Berne Conventions, the PCT, the Madrid Protocol, the Hague Agreement and the 2024 WIPO Treaty enter Indian law. Even where the subject of an IP treaty would normally fall in the State List or the Concurrent List, Article 253 empowers Parliament to legislate on it for the purpose of implementing the treaty. This is why every IP statute in India is a Union law without exception. |
Constitutional Rights that Touch IP
Article | Right | Connection with IP |
|---|---|---|
Article 19(1)(a) | Freedom of speech and expression | Limits copyright in cases of fair dealing, parody and political criticism (Civic Chandran v. Ammini Amma). |
Article 19(1)(g) | Right to practise any profession, trade or business | Underpins the freedom to design, manufacture, brand; balanced against IP monopolies. |
Article 21 | Right to life and personal liberty (incl. health) | Underpins compulsory licensing for essential medicines (Bayer v. Natco). |
Article 300A | No deprivation of property save by authority of law | IP is "property" within this Article (Entertainment Network v. Super Cassettes). |
Article 39(b) | DPSP — material resources of community | Sometimes invoked in compulsory-licensing arguments. |
Article 51(c) | DPSP — respect for international law | Informs treaty-implementation through IP statutes. |
2. International Treaties as Sources
India is a party to all the major IP treaties. Under Indian law, treaties do not become directly enforceable; they require legislative enactment under Article 253. The treaties therefore work as the architecture against which Indian statutes are drafted and interpreted, and they establish the minimum standards that every Indian statute must satisfy.
Treaties to Which India Is a Party
Treaty | Year | Subject Matter |
|---|---|---|
Paris Convention | 1883 (acceded 1998) | Industrial property — national treatment, right of priority. |
Berne Convention | 1886 (acceded 1928) | Copyright — automatic protection; no formalities. |
UCC | 1952 (acceded 1957) | Bridge between Berne and US-style copyright. |
Rome Convention | 1961 (not party — but reflected in Indian law) | Performers, producers, broadcasters. |
WIPO Convention | 1967 (joined 1975) | Established WIPO at Geneva. |
PCT | 1970 (acceded 1998) | International patent application. |
Budapest Treaty | 1977 (acceded 2001) | Microorganism deposits for patent purposes. |
TRIPS | 1995 (member) | Annex 1C of WTO Agreement; minimum IP standards. |
Madrid Protocol | 1989 (acceded 2013) | International trademark filing. |
WCT and WPPT | 1996 (acceded 2018) | Internet treaties on copyright and performances. |
Marrakesh Treaty | 2013 (acceded 2014) | Access to published works for visually impaired persons. |
WIPO Treaty on GR & TK | 2024 (signed; ratification awaited) | Mandatory disclosure of origin for inventions based on genetic resources or TK. |
✅ How treaties enter Indian law Under the dualist approach followed in India, an international treaty does not automatically become part of Indian law. Article 253 empowers Parliament to enact a statute giving effect to the treaty. Almost every modern Indian IP statute — the 1999 amendments to the Patents Act, the Trade Marks Act 1999, the GI Act 1999, the Designs Act 2000, the SICLD Act 2000, and the PPV&FR Act 2001 — was enacted to bring Indian law into conformity with TRIPS. |
3. The Statutory Framework
The substantive Indian IP statutes form the operational core of the field. Each is a self-contained regime with its own subject-matter, eligibility, registration procedure, term, infringement and remedies. Together they cover all nine recognised kinds of IP.
A. Primary IP Statutes
Statute | Year | Object |
|---|---|---|
Copyright Act | 1957 | Literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works; films; sound recordings. |
Patents Act | 1970 | Inventions — products and processes. |
Trade Marks Act | 1999 | Marks distinguishing goods or services. |
Designs Act | 2000 | Industrial designs — visual appearance of articles. |
GI Act | 1999 | Geographical indications. |
SICLD Act | 2000 | Semiconductor integrated circuits layout-designs. |
PPV&FR Act | 2001 | Plant varieties and farmers' rights. |
Biological Diversity Act | 2002 | Biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. |
B. Statutes that Indirectly Govern IP
- Indian Contract Act 1872 — assignment, licensing, non-disclosure agreements; Section 27 (restraint of trade).
- Information Technology Act 2000 — software, intermediaries' liability (Section 79), data protection.
- Customs Act 1962 — read with the IPR (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules 2007 — border measures.
- Code of Civil Procedure 1908 — Order XXXIX (injunctions), Order XXVI (commissions).
- Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023) — offences relating to false marks and counterfeit currency.
- Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 — interplay with patent linkage and Section 107A Patents Act.
- Competition Act 2002 — Section 3(5) (saving of IP-based agreements from anti-competition prohibition).
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 — IP as part of corporate debtor's estate.
4. Rules, Regulations and Notifications
Each IP statute is supplemented by Rules notified by the Central Government, and by regulations and orders issued by the relevant authorities. These are operational sources and frequently amended.
Statute | Principal Rules / Regulations |
|---|---|
Copyright Act 1957 | Copyright Rules, 2013 |
Patents Act 1970 | Patents Rules, 2003 (extensively amended; latest 2024) |
Trade Marks Act 1999 | Trade Marks Rules, 2017 |
Designs Act 2000 | Designs Rules, 2001 |
GI Act 1999 | Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Rules, 2002 |
PPV&FR Act 2001 | PPV&FR Rules, 2003 and Regulations |
SICLD Act 2000 | SICLD Rules, 2001 |
Biological Diversity Act 2002 | BD Rules, 2004; ABS Regulations 2014 |
Cross-cutting | IPR (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 |
5. Judicial Decisions as a Source
Decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all courts in India under Article 141 of the Constitution. High Court decisions are binding on subordinate courts within the territorial jurisdiction. Foreign decisions, while not binding, have considerable persuasive value — Indian IP statutes are largely modelled on UK and US prototypes, and Indian courts regularly cite English, American and EU jurisprudence.
Foundational Indian Cases
- R.G. Anand v. Delux Films, AIR 1978 SC 1613 — idea-expression dichotomy.
- Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak, (2008) 1 SCC 1 — modicum-of-creativity test for originality.
- Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India, 2005 (30) PTC 253 (Del) — moral rights under Section 57 Copyright Act.
- Novartis AG v. Union of India, (2013) 6 SCC 1 — Section 3(d) and anti-evergreening.
- Bayer Corporation v. Natco Pharma Ltd., 2014 (60) PTC 277 (Bom) — first compulsory licence.
- Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals, (2001) 5 SCC 73 — deceptive similarity test.
- Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora, 1999 (19) PTC 201 (Del) — domain name as trademark.
- Microfibres Inc. v. Girdhar & Co., (2009) 40 PTC 519 (Del-DB) — copyright/design overlap, Section 15 Copyright Act.
- Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. v. Super Cassettes, (2008) 13 SCC 30 — copyright as Article 300A property.
Adjudicatory Hierarchy after the Tribunals Reforms Act 2021
The Tribunals Reforms Act 2021 abolished the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB). Appellate jurisdiction is now distributed as follows:
Forum | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|
Registrar / Controller | Original — registration, opposition, rectification. |
High Court (commercial division / IP division) | Appeal from Registrar / Controller; rectification suits; suits valued above Rs. 3 lakh. |
Commercial Court (district level) | IP suits below Rs. 3 lakh and within commercial-court jurisdiction. |
Supreme Court of India | Special leave / appeal under Article 136. |
✅ Delhi High Court IPD In July 2022, the Delhi High Court created a dedicated Intellectual Property Division (IPD), the first of its kind in India. It hears all IP-related original suits, appeals from the Registrar / Controller, and writ petitions. The IPD has its own Rules of Practice (the High Court of Delhi Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2022), which set out condensed timelines and procedures specifically tailored to IP litigation. |
🎯 EXAM POINTERS — TOPIC 9
|