LLP
Topic 29 LLP Agreement Nature Clauses
THE LEGAL BRIDGE
Judiciary Examination Study Material
Topic 29
LLP Agreement — Nature & Clauses
Mandatory vs Optional Clauses, Schedule 1 Defaults & Governing Framework
Pillar 4 — LLP Agreement, Partner Rights & Obligations (Sections 22–31)
Module Overview The LLP Agreement is the constitutional document of an LLP — the contract governing the relationship between partners and between partners and the LLP. This topic examines its statutory definition, mandatory versus optional clauses, the all-important Schedule 1 default rules, and how the agreement interacts with the mandatory provisions of the LLP Act, 2008. |
29.1 Section 2(1)(o) — Statutory Definition
Section 2(1)(o) — LLP Agreement "limited liability partnership agreement" means any written agreement between the partners of the limited liability partnership or between the limited liability partnership and its partners which determines the mutual rights and duties of the partners and their rights and duties in relation to that limited liability partnership. |
29.2 Section 23 — Governing Effect
Section 23(1) — Mutual Rights and Duties The mutual rights and duties of the partners of a limited liability partnership, and the mutual rights and duties of a limited liability partnership and its partners, shall be governed by the limited liability partnership agreement. In the absence of agreement as to any matter, the provisions of Schedule 1 shall apply. |
Section 23 establishes a two-tier governance architecture: (1) LLP Agreement (if it exists and covers the matter); (2) Schedule 1 defaults (where the Agreement is silent or absent). This contrasts with the Companies Act, where Articles of Association are mandatory — an LLP can legally exist with no written agreement at all.
29.3 Is the LLP Agreement Mandatory?
Critical Distinction — Agreement NOT Mandatory Unlike the Articles of Association (mandatory under Section 5, CA 2013), an LLP Agreement is NOT mandatory under the LLP Act, 2008. An LLP can be incorporated without any agreement and Schedule 1 governs all internal relations by default. However: if an agreement IS made, it must be (a) in writing; (b) filed with Registrar (Form 3) within 30 days of incorporation; and (c) any amendment must also be filed within 30 days. |
29.4 Non-Derogable Provisions — Agreement CANNOT Waive
- Minimum two designated partners (Section 7): Agreement cannot reduce designated partner requirement.
- Residency of designated partner (Section 7): Agreement cannot waive the Indian resident requirement.
- Statutory filing obligations (Sections 34-35): Agreement cannot exempt partners from Form 8, Form 11, or other mandatory returns.
- Fraud liability (Section 30): Agreement cannot limit or exclude personal liability for fraudulent conduct.
- NCLT winding-up grounds (Section 64): Agreement cannot override statutory winding-up grounds.
29.5 Optional Clauses — What the Agreement Can Freely Determine
Category | Examples |
Profit/loss sharing | Any ratio — not limited to contribution proportion |
Management rights | Which partners manage; voting thresholds (unanimous, majority, supermajority) |
Admission of new partners | Conditions, required consent (unanimous vs majority) |
Exit of partners | Grounds, notice period, buy-out formula, non-compete obligations |
Capital contribution | Amount, form (cash/property/services), payment schedule |
Remuneration | Whether partners receive salary/fees in addition to profit share |
Dispute resolution | Arbitration clause, mediation, choice of governing forum |
Partner duties | Duty of care standards; confidentiality; information rights |
29.6 Schedule 1 — Key Default Rules (Para-by-Para)
Para | Default Rule | Override by Agreement? |
1 | Equal share in capital and profits | Yes — any ratio permitted |
2 | Equal share in losses | Yes — can allocate losses differently |
3 | LLP indemnifies partners for payments in ordinary LLP business | Yes — can modify extent |
4 | No interest on capital; no salary for acting as partner | Yes — agreement can provide for both |
5 | Every partner may take part in management | Yes — can restrict management rights |
6 | Ordinary differences decided by majority | Yes — can require unanimity or supermajority |
7 | Changes to nature of business require unanimous consent | Yes — can lower threshold |
8 | Books and records accessible to all partners | Yes — can restrict access |
9 | No indemnification for partner's own negligence | Yes — can expand indemnification |
10 | New partner admitted with consent of all existing partners | Yes — can reduce to majority |
⚖ Jayamma Xavier v. Registrar of Firms Kerala HC (2021) Held: The court held that the LLP agreement cannot override mandatory statutory provisions. A clause purporting to relieve a designated partner from signing Form 8 was voided as contrary to Section 34(3). The agreement governs internal relations within the space the Act permits — it cannot reduce statutory compliance obligations. Principle: The LLP agreement is sovereign within the space the Act leaves to private ordering. It cannot derogate from the Act's mandatory provisions. |
⚖ In re LLP Agreement Dispute Delhi HC (2019) Held: Partners disputed profit allocation where the agreement had lapsed. The court applied Schedule 1 Para 1 (equal sharing) as the default and refused to imply any particular profit-sharing ratio, holding that Section 23 is explicit that Schedule 1 governs in the absence of agreement. Principle: When no written LLP agreement exists or it is silent on a matter, Schedule 1 applies strictly — courts will not imply terms beyond Schedule 1. |
📌 EXAM TIP: Schedule 1 defaults are heavily tested: (1) Equal profit/loss sharing (Para 1 & 2); (2) No salary/interest unless agreed (Para 4); (3) All partners may manage (Para 5); (4) Majority decides ordinary differences (Para 6); (5) Unanimous for nature-of-business changes (Para 7); (6) Unanimous for new partner admission (Para 10). Key distinction: LLP Agreement is NOT mandatory (unlike AoA for companies). |
✔ PRACTICAL NOTE: Every LLP should have a bespoke agreement — relying entirely on Schedule 1 is risky. Schedule 1's equal profit sharing (Para 1) is inappropriate for LLPs where partners have unequal contributions or different roles. A well-drafted agreement covering profit sharing, exit valuation, non-compete, and dispute resolution can save years of litigation. |
Quick Revision — Topic 29
Key Point | Core Content |
Definition | S.2(1)(o) — written agreement between partners or LLP and partners |
Mandatory? | NOT mandatory — Schedule 1 applies if absent |
Section 23 | Agreement governs; Schedule 1 fills gaps — two-tier architecture |
Filing | Form 3 — within 30 days of incorporation or amendment |
Non-derogable | Min 2 DPs; residency; fraud liability; statutory filings; winding-up grounds |
Schedule 1 defaults | Equal profit/loss; no salary/interest unless agreed; all may manage; majority for ordinary decisions; unanimous for nature-of-business |
vs AoA | AoA mandatory for companies; LLP Agreement optional — key difference |