THE LEGAL BRIDGE

Bridging Law, Learning & Success

HINDU LAW — COMPREHENSIVE NOTES

Topic 61

Disqualified Heirs

Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Relevant Sections: Sections 25, 26, 27, 28 HSA

Priority: MEDIUM | Exam Relevance: DJS/PCS-J

www.thelegalbridge.in

Disqualified Heirs under the Hindu Succession Act

1. Introduction

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 provides for certain disqualifications from inheritance. These provisions serve important policy objectives: ensuring that no person profits from wrongdoing (S.25), maintaining the Hindu identity of the line of succession (S.26), creating a clear mechanism for property devolution when heirs are disqualified (S.27), and protecting persons with disabilities from discriminatory exclusion (S.28). Understanding these sections is critical for both objective and descriptive examinations.

2. Section 25 — Murderer Disqualified

Text: A person who commits murder or abets the commission of murder shall be disqualified from inheriting the property of the person murdered, or any other property in furtherance of the succession to which he or she committed or abetted the commission of the murder.

Analytical Points

• Only Murder & Abetment: The disqualification is strictly confined to murder (S.300 IPC / S.101 BNS) and abetment of murder (S.109 IPC / S.45 BNS). Other homicidal offences such as culpable homicide not amounting to murder (S.299 IPC / S.100 BNS) are NOT covered. This is a deliberate legislative choice.
• Conviction Requirement: While the section does not expressly mandate a criminal conviction, in practice courts require either a conviction or at least a clear finding by the civil court that the person committed or abetted murder. The standard of proof in civil proceedings is preponderance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt.
• Scope — ‘Any Other Property’: The disqualification extends not just to the murdered person’s property but also to ‘any other property in furtherance of the succession.’ This prevents indirect benefit from murder.
• Descendants Not Affected: The disqualification is personal to the murderer. The murderer’s children, grandchildren, or other descendants are NOT disqualified. They can inherit through the murderer or independently.
• Underlying Principle: Nemo ex suo delicto meliorem suam conditionem facere potest — No person can improve their position by their own wrongdoing. This is a universal equitable principle recognized across legal systems.

3. Section 26 — Convert’s Descendants Disqualified

Text: Where, before or after the commencement of this Act, a Hindu has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion, children born to him or her after such conversion and their descendants shall be disqualified from inheriting the property of any of their Hindu relatives, unless such children or descendants are Hindus at the time when the succession opens.

Analytical Points

• Convert Himself/Herself — NOT Disqualified: A person who converts out of Hinduism is NOT personally disqualified from inheriting from Hindu relatives. The disqualification applies only to children born AFTER conversion.
• Children Born After Conversion: Only children born after the parent’s conversion are disqualified, not children born before.
• Exception — Re-conversion: Even children born after conversion can inherit if they are Hindus at the time when the succession opens. This covers cases of re-conversion or independent adoption of Hinduism.
• Rationale: The provision targets the remoteness of family ties resulting from conversion, not conversion itself. Children raised outside the Hindu faith after parental conversion are presumed to have weaker ties to the Hindu family.
• Read with S.2 HSA: The definition of ‘Hindu’ under S.2 includes Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs. Conversion to these religions would NOT trigger S.26.

4. Section 27 — Succession When Heir Disqualified

Text: If any person is disqualified from inheriting any property under this Act, it shall devolve as if such person had died before the intestate.

Analytical Points

• Deeming Fiction: The disqualified person is treated as if he/she had predeceased the intestate. This is a legal fiction that determines how property devolves.
• Practical Effect: The next heir in line (who would have inherited had the disqualified person actually died) takes the property. The disqualified person’s own heirs may also benefit if they would take through representation.
• Application to Both S.25 and S.26: This deeming provision applies to disqualifications under both S.25 (murder) and S.26 (convert’s descendants).

5. Section 28 — Disease, Defect or Disability NOT a Bar

Text: No person shall be disqualified from succeeding to any property on the ground of any disease, defect, or deformity.

Analytical Points

• Complete Protection: The section protects persons with ALL types of diseases, defects, and disabilities without exception — physical, mental, congenital, or acquired.
• Overruled Old Law: Under pre-1956 Hindu law (particularly the Mitakshara), persons suffering from blindness (andha), deafness (badhira), leprosy (kushtha), lunacy (unmatta/jada), or impotence (kliba) were excluded from inheritance. Section 28 abolished this entirely.
• Constitutional Harmony: This provision aligns with Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination), and 21 (dignity) of the Constitution of India. It reflects the modern constitutional ethos of inclusivity.
• Practical Significance: A person with mental illness, physical disability, or any medical condition has FULL rights of inheritance equal to any other heir. No separate application, certificate, or court order is needed.

6. Comparative Table

7. Mnemonics & Exam Tips

— End of Topic 61 —

www.thelegalbridge.in | For RJS, DJS & PCS-J Preparation