Criminal Procedure: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)

A Bail Bond and a Personal Bond Compared: With Sureties and Without, and Why the Difference Decides Whether an Order of Bail Works at All

A bail bond binds the accused and one or more sufficient sureties. A personal bond — what the Sanhita calls release on his own bond — binds the accused alone. The difference looks technical and is in fact decisive: the first requires him to find somebody; the second requires nothing but his own signature.

That is why it matters so much in practice. An order of bail is worth nothing until it is complied with. A person granted bail on a bond with two sureties, who has no property and no connections, remains in jail — released in law and not in fact, and in exactly the position of a man whose application was refused.

1. The Two Compared

Figure 1: A bail bond and a personal bond

The provisions

Section 485: before any person is released on bond or bail bond, a bond for such sum of money as the police officer or Court thinks sufficient shall be executed by such person, and, when he is released on bail, by one or more sufficient sureties, conditioned that such person shall attend at the time and place mentioned in the bond and shall continue so to attend until otherwise directed.

Proviso to section 478: where a person accused of a bailable offence is unable to give bail within a week of the date of his arrest, it shall be sufficient ground for the officer or the Court to presume that he is an indigent person — and he shall be released on his executing a bond without sureties.

Section 484(1): the amount of every bond shall be fixed with due regard to the circumstances of the case and shall not be excessive. Section 484(2): the High Court or the Court of Session may direct that the bail required by a police officer or Magistrate be reduced.

Section 490: where a person is required to execute a bond with or without sureties, the Court or officer may permit him to deposit a sum of money or Government promissory notes instead — except where the bond is for good behaviour.

  • Where a bail bond is required. The ordinary course on release on bail in a non-bailable offence, and wherever the Court considers a surety necessary.
  • Where a personal bond is provided. The proviso to section 478 for a person presumed indigent; the first proviso to section 479 for a first-time offender completing one-third of the maximum period, who is released on bond; and section 430, under which an appellate court may release a convict on his own bond.
  • And the machinery around sureties. Section 486 requires every surety to declare the number of persons to whom he has stood surety, with all relevant particulars. Section 488 permits the Court to act where sureties are insufficient or become so. Section 489 permits a surety to apply at any time to be discharged, whereupon the accused must find others.

2. Why the Difference Matters

Figure 2: The four propositions

📖 Kadra Pahadiya v. State of Bihar, (1981) 3 SCC 671

Facts: It came to the Court’s notice that undertrial prisoners were being held in custody for very long periods, some in fetters, in cases in which they had been granted bail but were unable to furnish the bonds and sureties required, and in which they had no legal representation at all.

Held: The Supreme Court held that the continued detention of undertrial prisoners who have been granted bail but cannot furnish sureties is a denial of their right under Article 21, and that an order of bail which the prisoner cannot comply with leaves him in exactly the position of one refused bail. The Court held that the requirement of monetary bail with sureties operates against the poor, who have no property and no persons of means willing to stand for them, and that courts must consider whether release on a personal bond would serve. It directed that undertrial prisoners in such cases be identified and released on their own bonds where appropriate, that legal aid be provided to those without representation, and that the practice of keeping undertrials in fetters be discontinued save where strictly justified. The Court emphasised that the object of bail is to secure attendance, and that where that can be achieved by a personal bond, requiring more serves no purpose the law recognises.

Ratio: The continued detention of a prisoner granted bail who cannot furnish sureties denies his right under Article 21, leaving him in the position of one refused bail. Monetary bail with sureties operates against the poor, and release on a personal bond should be considered.

  1. An order of bail is worth nothing until it is complied with. A person granted bail on terms he cannot meet remains in jail.
  2. Which is why an excessive amount is a denial of bail. Section 484(1) requires the amount to be fixed with due regard to the circumstances of the case — meaning the circumstances of the particular accused: his means, his employment, his ties to the place. An order on terms he cannot possibly meet is, in substance, an order refusing bail.
  3. And why the Sanhita presumes indigence. The proviso to section 478: inability to give bail within a week of arrest in a bailable offence is sufficient ground for presuming that he is an indigent person, and he shall be released on a bond without sureties.
  4. The superior courts can correct it. Section 484(2) permits the High Court or Court of Session to direct that the bail required by a police officer or Magistrate be reduced — which is the remedy where an order of bail has been made worthless by its own terms.

⚠ The local surety problem

The requirement of a local surety is the condition which most often defeats an order of bail in practice.

A migrant worker, a person from another district, or one with no family nearby has no means of producing one — however modest the amount of the bond.

The condition is usually imposed to ensure that the surety can be found and proceeded against if the accused absconds. But where that object can be achieved otherwise — by a surety from elsewhere, by a deposit under section 490, or by a personal bond with conditions as to reporting — insisting on a local surety serves no purpose except to keep him in custody.

And section 489 should be kept in mind on the other side: a surety may apply at any time to be discharged, whereupon the accused must find others — so an arrangement which worked at the outset may fail months later, and the accused may find himself back before the Court.

3. Key Takeaways

The position stated shortly

1. A bail bond binds the accused and one or more sufficient sureties; a personal bond binds the accused alone.

2. Section 485: a bond is executed by the person, and where the release is on bail, by sureties, conditioned that he shall attend and shall continue so to attend.

3. Proviso to section 478: inability to give bail within a week in a bailable offence is ground for presuming indigence, and release follows on a bond without sureties.

4. Section 479 first proviso: a first-time offender completing one-third of the maximum period is released on bond, not on bail.

5. Section 484(1): the amount shall be fixed with due regard to the circumstances of the case and shall not be excessive.

6. Section 484(2): the High Court or Court of Session may direct that the bail required by a police officer or Magistrate be reduced.

7. Section 490 permits a deposit of money or Government promissory notes in lieu of a bond, except for good behaviour.

8. An order of bail the prisoner cannot comply with leaves him in the position of one refused bail, and denies his right under Article 21: Kadra Pahadiya.

9. Monetary bail with sureties operates against the poor, and release on a personal bond should be considered where attendance can be secured by it.

10. And section 489 permits a surety to be discharged at any time, so an arrangement which worked at the outset may fail later and require fresh sureties.

4. Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between the two?

A bail bond binds the accused and one or more sufficient sureties; a personal bond binds the accused alone on his own undertaking. The first requires him to find somebody; the second requires nothing but his own signature.

When must a person be released on a personal bond?

Under the proviso to section 478, where a person accused of a bailable offence is unable to give bail within a week of his arrest — that being sufficient ground for presuming him indigent. A first-time offender under section 479 is also released on bond.

How is the amount of a bond fixed?

With due regard to the circumstances of the case, and it shall not be excessive — meaning the circumstances of the particular accused: his means, his employment and his ties to the place.

What if the amount is beyond his means?

An order on terms he cannot meet is in substance an order refusing bail. Section 484(2) permits the High Court or the Court of Session to direct that the bail required by a police officer or Magistrate be reduced.

Why does the requirement of sureties matter so much?

Because an order of bail is worth nothing until it is complied with. A prisoner granted bail who cannot furnish sureties remains in jail, in exactly the position of one refused bail — and the requirement operates against the poor: Kadra Pahadiya v. State of Bihar.

Can money be deposited instead of a bond?

Yes. Section 490 permits the Court or officer to allow a deposit of a sum of money or Government promissory notes instead of executing a bond — except where the bond is for good behaviour.

Related Topics

  • The Bail Bond, the Surety and the Conditions
  • Bail and Bonds: Sections 478 to 496, BNSS
  • Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences Compared
  • Undertrial Detention: Section 479, BNSS
  • Bail as the Rule and Jail as the Exception
  • Bail and Article 21