Banking Law
Crossing of Cheques under Sections 123 to 131 NI Act: Effect on the Banker
Crossing is the simplest security device in banking and one of the oldest. Two lines across the face of a cheque mean that it cannot be turned into cash over a counter by whoever happens to be holding it, and must instead pass through a bank account, leaving a trace of who received the money. The law of crossing is almost entirely about the duty it places on the paying banker, which is why it belongs in banking law as much as in the law of negotiable instruments.
Figure 1: The four kinds of crossing
1. General Crossing
Section 123, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Where a cheque bears across its face an addition of the words "and company" or any abbreviation thereof, between two parallel transverse lines, or of two parallel transverse lines simply, either with or without the words "not negotiable", that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally. |
- The lines are essential: for a general crossing the two parallel transverse lines are the crossing. Words alone, without the lines, do not make a general crossing.
- The words are optional: and company, its abbreviation, and not negotiable may be added but are not necessary.
- Where it appears: across the face of the cheque. The usual place is the top left corner, but position is not prescribed and any place across the face will do.
- The effect: the cheque cannot be paid over the counter in cash. It must be paid to a banker, which means in practice that it must be collected into an account.
2. Special Crossing
Section 124, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Where a cheque bears across its face an addition of the name of a banker, either with or without the words "not negotiable", that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed specially, and to be crossed to that banker. |
Figure 2: The two statutory crossings compared
- The name is essential: for a special crossing the name of a banker is the crossing. The parallel lines are not necessary, which is the exact reverse of a general crossing.
- The effect: the cheque may be paid only to the banker named, or to his agent for collection, so it narrows the class of permissible recipients from all bankers to one.
- A stronger protection: a thief must now not merely open an account somewhere, but must get the cheque collected through one particular bank.
- Conversion: a general crossing may be made special, but a special crossing may not be made general again, because that would reduce the protection the drawer intended.
3. Who May Cross, and When
- The drawer: may cross the cheque before issuing it, which is the ordinary case and needs no statutory authority.
- Section 125: after issue, the holder may cross an uncrossed cheque generally or specially; may cross a cheque crossed generally specially; and may add the words not negotiable to either crossing.
- The collecting banker's power: where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker to whom it is crossed may again cross it specially to another banker as his agent for collection. This is the only permitted double crossing.
- Opening a crossing: the drawer may cancel a crossing by writing pay cash and signing it in full. This is a matter of banking practice rather than of the Act, and a paying banker acts on it only where the signature matches the specimen.
- Obliterated crossing: where a crossing has been obliterated and the cheque does not appear to be crossed when presented, Section 89 protects a banker who pays according to the apparent tenor and otherwise in due course.
4. The Paying Banker's Duty
- Section 126, general crossing: where a cheque is crossed generally, the banker on whom it is drawn shall not pay it otherwise than to a banker.
- Section 126, special crossing: where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker shall not pay it otherwise than to the banker to whom it is crossed, or his agent for collection.
- Section 127, double crossing: where a cheque is crossed specially to more than one banker, except when crossed to an agent for the purpose of collection, the banker on whom it is drawn shall refuse payment. Two conflicting special crossings are a sign of interference with the instrument.
- Section 129, payment out of due course: a banker paying a crossed cheque otherwise than in accordance with these provisions is liable to the true owner of the cheque for any loss he may sustain owing to the cheque having been so paid. The liability is to the true owner, who may be a person the bank has never dealt with.
- Section 128, the protection: where the banker on whom a crossed cheque is drawn has paid it in due course, the banker, and, if the cheque has come into the hands of the payee, the drawer, are placed in the same position as if the amount had been paid to and received by the true owner. Compliance with the crossing is therefore rewarded with a complete discharge.
⚠ Note Sections 128 and 129 are two sides of one rule. Pay a crossed cheque in due course and through the right channel, and the bank is completely discharged even if the person who received the money had no title. Pay it out of due course, by cash across the counter or through the wrong banker, and the bank answers to the true owner for the loss, however honest the mistake. |
5. The Not Negotiable Crossing
Section 130, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 A person taking a cheque crossed generally or specially, bearing in either case the words "not negotiable", shall not have, and shall not be capable of giving, a better title to the cheque than that which the person from whom he took it had. |
- It does not stop transfer: the cheque remains transferable. What it loses is negotiability in the technical sense, which is the capacity to give a transferee a better title than the transferor had.
- The consequence: a transferee who takes such a cheque in good faith and for value nonetheless takes it subject to every defect in his transferor's title. He cannot be a holder in due course free of prior equities.
- Who is protected: the true owner. If the cheque is stolen and passed on, even an innocent purchaser must return it or answer in conversion, which is the opposite of the ordinary rule for negotiable instruments.
- Both crossings: the words may be added to a general or a special crossing, and may be added after issue by the holder under Section 125.
- No effect on the paying banker's protection: the words are directed at title between transferees, not at the bank. A paying banker who pays in due course through a banker is still protected by Section 128.
6. The Account Payee Crossing
- Not in the statute: the account payee crossing appears nowhere in the Negotiable Instruments Act. It rests entirely on banking practice, and has been recognised by the courts and by the Reserve Bank's directions.
- To whom it is addressed: not to the paying banker but to the collecting banker. It is a direction that the proceeds be credited only to the account of the named payee.
- Effect on the collecting banker: a banker who collects an account payee cheque for anyone other than the named payee will find it very difficult to show that he acted without negligence, and so loses the protection of Section 131.
- Effect on the paying banker: strictly none, since the direction is not addressed to him and he cannot see into the collecting bank's ledger. A paying banker who pays a crossed cheque to a banker has complied with Section 126.
- Effect on transferability: in principle the words do not restrict transfer, but in practice an account payee cheque is not collected for anyone but the payee, so it has become effectively non-transferable. The Reserve Bank has directed banks not to collect account payee cheques for any person other than the payee, with a narrow exception allowing a bank to collect such cheques of up to ₹50,000 for a co-operative credit society customer where the payees are the society's own constituents.
- Why it is the strongest crossing: a general crossing requires a bank account somewhere, a special crossing requires a particular bank, but an account payee crossing requires the payee's own account, which leaves a thief with nothing to do with the instrument.
7. Questions Arising
Does a crossing make a cheque non-transferable?
A plain crossing does not. It only directs how payment is to be made, through a banker rather than across the counter, and leaves transferability untouched. A not negotiable crossing leaves the cheque transferable but destroys negotiability, so no transferee can take a better title than his transferor. Only words such as pay X only, which strike at transfer itself, make a cheque genuinely non-transferable, and in practice an account payee crossing has the same effect because no bank will collect it for anyone else.
Can a paying banker ignore an account payee crossing?
In strict law the direction is not addressed to him, and he complies with Section 126 by paying a crossed cheque to a banker. He has no means of knowing into whose account the collecting bank will credit the proceeds. In practice the Reserve Bank's directions make the collecting banker responsible for the crossing, and a paying banker who notices something irregular on the face of the instrument should still enquire, since ignoring a visible warning is itself evidence of want of care.
⚠ Key point A general crossing (Section 123) is constituted by two parallel transverse lines, with or without words; a special crossing (Section 124) by the name of a banker, with or without lines. The drawer may cross before issue, and Section 125 allows the holder to cross, to make a general crossing special and to add not negotiable, and allows a banker to cross specially again to another banker as agent for collection. Section 126 forbids payment of a generally crossed cheque otherwise than to a banker, and of a specially crossed cheque otherwise than to the named banker or his collecting agent; Section 127 requires refusal of a double special crossing except for collection; Section 129 makes a banker paying out of due course liable to the true owner; and Section 128 gives a complete discharge to one who pays in due course. Section 130 provides that a not negotiable crossing prevents a transferee from acquiring or giving a better title than his transferor had. The account payee crossing is not in the Act; it is a direction to the collecting banker, and the Reserve Bank forbids collection for anyone but the payee. |
8. Quick Revision
✦ Points worth fixing Lines make the general crossing; the name makes the special one. Each is essential to its own kind and optional to the other. General can become special; special cannot become general. Section 126 commands, Section 127 refuses, Section 128 protects, Section 129 punishes. Not negotiable kills negotiability, not transferability. Account payee is not in the Act at all, and it speaks to the collecting banker. Any banker, one banker, the payee's own account. The three crossings in rising order of strength. The only lawful double crossing is to an agent for collection. Section 129 makes the bank answer to the true owner, a person it has never met. |
9. Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a general and a special crossing?
A general crossing under Section 123 consists of two parallel transverse lines across the face, with or without words, and means the cheque may be paid only to a banker. A special crossing under Section 124 consists of the name of a banker, with or without lines, and means the cheque may be paid only to that banker or his agent for collection. The lines are essential to the first and unnecessary to the second.
What does a not negotiable crossing do?
Under Section 130, a person taking a cheque crossed generally or specially and bearing the words not negotiable shall not have, and shall not be capable of giving, a better title than his transferor had. The cheque remains transferable, but no transferee can become a holder in due course free of defects in the earlier title, so the true owner is protected against a thief's innocent purchaser.
Is the account payee crossing recognised by the Negotiable Instruments Act?
No. It appears nowhere in the Act and rests on banking practice, recognised by the courts and by the Reserve Bank. It is a direction to the collecting banker to credit the proceeds only to the account of the named payee, and a collecting banker who disregards it will struggle to prove he acted without negligence under Section 131.
What must a paying banker do with a cheque crossed to two banks?
Refuse payment, under Section 127, unless the second crossing is to a banker as an agent for collection, which is the only permitted double special crossing. Two independent special crossings suggest that the instrument has been interfered with.
What happens if a bank pays a crossed cheque across the counter?
It has paid out of due course, and under Section 129 it is liable to the true owner for any loss he sustains, however honest the mistake. It also loses the protection of Section 128, which rewards only payment in due course, and it cannot debit its customer's account if the payment was outside the mandate.
10. Related Topics and Provisions
- The cheque as a banker's instrument
- The paying banker and payment in due course
- The collecting banker and the protection of Section 131
- Dishonour of cheques under Section 138
- Duties of a banker: secrecy, care and honouring cheques