All NotesCivil LawIndian Partnership Act

Indian Partnership Act

The Firm as a Compendious Name for the Partners

When a supplier invoices M/s Sharma and Sons, he is not dealing with a person called Sharma and Sons. He is dealing with the partners of that firm, all of them, under a shorter name. That is what the courts mean by calling a firm a compendious or collective name. This note explains what the firm name does, what it does not do, how the name may be chosen, and the practical consequences in contracts, suits and changes in the firm.

The firm name as a label on a bundle of partners, what it does and does not do, and why it matters in practice

1. The Idea

§ Section 4, read closely

Persons who have entered into partnership with one another are called individually partners and collectively a firm, and the name under which their business is carried on is called the firm name.

So 'the firm' is a word for the partners, taken together, and 'the firm name' is a word for the business they carry on. Neither creates a person.

The classic formulation: the firm name is a compendious mode of designating the persons who have agreed to carry on business in partnership.

2. What the Firm Name Does

i. Commercial identity. It lets the business trade, bank, invoice, advertise and build goodwill under one name.

ii. Registration. The firm is registered under the name in the Register of Firms under Chapter VII, and changes are recorded against it.

iii. Procedure. Partners may sue and be sued in the firm name under the Code of Civil Procedure, which spares a plaintiff from naming every partner.

iv. Goodwill. Goodwill, which attaches largely to the name, is property of the firm and may be sold on dissolution under Section 55.

3. What the Firm Name Does Not Do

Misconception

The correct position

The firm is a person

It is not. The name designates the partners collectively

The firm owns its property

The partners own it, for the purposes of the business: Sections 14 to 16

The name limits liability

It does not. Each partner is liable jointly and severally, with his personal estate: Section 25

The firm continues regardless of its partners

A change of partners reconstitutes the firm, subject to contract; the name may continue but the firm is not the same aggregate

Registration of the name gives exclusive rights

It does not. Protection of a name comes from trade mark law and the action for passing off

4. Choosing and Using the Name

§ Rules and cautions

• Freedom with limits. Partners may adopt any name, subject to the law of passing off and trade marks, and to the rules on registration.

• Section 58(3). The firm name shall not contain words expressing or implying the sanction, approval or patronage of Government, except where the State Government signifies its consent in writing.

• Deceptive similarity. A name so similar to that of an existing business as to deceive may attract an action for passing off.

• Signing. A partner signing in the firm name binds the firm and all the partners, because he signs as agent under Section 18.

5. Why It Matters in Practice

Situation

Consequence

A contract is signed 'for M/s XYZ and Co.'

The partners are bound, through the agency of the signing partner, if the act is within his implied authority: Sections 18 and 19

A creditor sues the firm

The suit is in substance against the partners; a decree may be executed against them as the procedural rules allow

The same partners run two businesses under different names

Whether there is one firm or two depends on their intention, judged on the facts of each case

A partner retires but the name continues

He remains liable for acts done before retirement, and for later acts until public notice is given: Section 32

A stranger allows the firm to use his name

He may be liable by holding out under Section 28 to anyone who gives credit on the faith of it

6. Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean to call a firm a compendious name?

That the firm name is simply a short way of naming all the partners together; there is no separate person behind it.

Can a firm name be anything the partners choose?

Largely yes, subject to passing off and trade mark law, and to Section 58(3), which bars words implying Government sanction without consent.

Does suing in the firm name mean the firm is a person?

No. It is a procedural convenience; the suit is in substance by or against the partners.