IPR
Topic 29 Kinds of Trademarks
Topic 29 — Historical Development and Kinds of Trademarks
Trademarks are older than the modern statutes that protect them. Marks of ownership and origin appear on Roman pottery shards two thousand years ago. The medieval guilds enforced exclusive marks for cloth and metalwork. The modern trademark statute is a relatively recent invention — England's first dedicated trademark statute came in 1875, India's in 1940. This topic traces the long arc from common-law passing off to the present Trade Marks Act 1999 and walks through every category of mark recognised by Indian law today, from the classical word and device marks to the cutting-edge non-conventional marks (sounds, shapes, colours, holograms, olfactory marks).
1. Historical Roots — Marks Before Statute
A. Ancient and Medieval Origins
Trademarks predate written law. Roman potters in the first century BCE inscribed identifiable marks on amphorae and tableware. Medieval guilds — bakers, goldsmiths, swordmakers — required members to use distinctive marks for quality control. The "merchant's mark" of medieval Europe served two purposes: identifying the manufacturer and enabling traceability when defective goods were detected. The English Cutlers Company's charter of 1416 is among the earliest formal trademark protections in the common-law world.
B. The Common-Law Period — Passing Off
Before statutes existed, trademark protection was provided by the common-law tort of "passing off". The classic statement is in Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd. v. Borden Inc., [1990] 1 All ER 873, where Lord Oliver formulated the "classical trinity" of passing off:
- Goodwill or reputation in the mark or get-up.
- Misrepresentation by the defendant that goods or services are those of the plaintiff.
- Damage or likelihood of damage to the plaintiff's goodwill.
✅ Passing off lives on Even after the Trade Marks Act 1999, common-law passing off remains a parallel remedy. Section 27(2) of the Act expressly preserves the right to sue for passing off in respect of any unregistered trademark. This is critical for businesses that have built reputation but have not registered. The Supreme Court in Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals (2001) 5 SCC 73 set out the modern Indian test for passing off in pharmaceutical mark disputes. |
2. The Move to Statutory Trademark Law
A. England
England's Trade Marks Registration Act 1875 was the first comprehensive trademark statute. It created a public Register, allowed registration and made registered marks easier to enforce than unregistered ones. The Act underwent multiple revisions: 1883, 1905, 1938 and finally the Trade Marks Act 1994, which brought UK law into compliance with the EU Trade Marks Directive.
B. India — From Colonial Statute to TRIPS-Compliant Modern Law
Year | Legislation | Significance |
|---|---|---|
Pre-1940 | Common-law passing off; IPC Sections 478-489 | No statute on registration; relief through tort and crime. |
1940 | Trade Marks Act 1940 | India's first registration statute, modelled on UK 1938 Act. |
1958 | Trade and Merchandise Marks Act 1958 | Replaced 1940 Act; consolidated trademark and merchandise marks; 7-year registration term. |
1999 | Trade Marks Act 1999 | Replaced 1958 Act to comply with TRIPS; in force 15 September 2003; 10-year term; service marks; well-known marks; collective marks. |
2010 | Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 2010 | Madrid Protocol; reduced opposition timeline; simplified renewal. |
2017 | Trade Marks Rules 2017 | Modernised application; non-conventional marks; reduced fees for individuals/startups. |
2021 | Tribunals Reforms Act 2021 | IPAB abolished; jurisdiction transferred to High Courts. |
✅ What changed in 1999 The 1999 Act introduced six major innovations over the 1958 Act: (i) registration of service marks; (ii) statutory recognition of collective marks (Sections 61-68) and certification marks (Sections 69-78); (iii) statutory recognition of well-known marks (Section 11(6)-(10)); (iv) extension of registration period from 7 to 10 years; (v) single application for multiple classes; (vi) enhanced criminal penalties for infringement. |
3. Kinds of Trademarks — Master Categorisation
A CONVENTIONAL word · device · composite | B STATUTORY collective · certification · well-known | C NON-CONVENTIONAL shape · colour · sound · smell |
4. Conventional Marks
A. Word Marks
A word mark consists exclusively of letters, numbers or words. It is registered for the verbal element only, irrespective of typeface, colour or stylisation. Word marks are the most flexible — the proprietor can use the mark in any visual form and still rely on the registration. Examples: TATA, INFOSYS, AMUL, FLIPKART. Registration of a word mark gives broader protection than a stylised version, because the proprietor can later change the visual rendering without losing registration.
B. Device Marks (Logos)
A device mark consists of a graphical element — a logo, symbol or pictorial representation — without verbal content. The Mercedes three-pointed star, the Nike swoosh, the Apple bitten apple are all device marks. Registration is for the specific visual representation; minor variations may not be covered.
C. Composite Marks
A composite mark combines verbal and visual elements — a word mark plus a device. The Coca-Cola wordmark with its distinctive script and the underlying ribbon device is the classic example. Composite marks present interesting infringement questions: does an infringement of the verbal element alone, without the device, infringe the registered composite? The answer turns on the dominant feature of the mark.
D. Service Marks
A service mark distinguishes services rather than goods. Section 2(1)(z) defines "service" to include any service made available to potential users. The 1999 Act for the first time allowed service marks to be registered in India. Examples: HDFC BANK, IRCTC, INDIGO. The Nice Classification reserves classes 35-45 for services.
5. Statutory Special Categories
A. Collective Marks — Sections 61 to 68
‘Collective Mark [Section 2(1)(g)]’ — means a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of members of an association of persons (not being a partnership within the meaning of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932) which is the proprietor of the mark from those of others. |
A collective mark is registered in the name of the association; individual members use it under regulations approved by the Registrar. Examples: the "CA" mark used by members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India; the "Recycled Paperboard" mark used by Recycled Paperboard Alliance members. The mark identifies membership in the association as well as compliance with the association's standards.
B. Certification Marks — Sections 69 to 78
‘Certification Mark [Section 2(1)(e)]’ — means a mark capable of distinguishing the goods or services in connection with which it is used in the course of trade which are certified by the proprietor of the mark in respect of origin, material, mode of manufacture of goods or performance of services, quality, accuracy or other characteristics from goods or services not so certified. |
A certification mark is owned by a body that does not itself trade in the goods or services; it certifies that goods or services bearing the mark meet defined standards. Indian examples: AGMARK (agricultural produce certified by the Directorate of Marketing and Inspection); ISI mark (Bureau of Indian Standards); Woolmark (Wool International). Owners of certification marks cannot themselves trade in the certified goods — Section 70 imposes this prohibition to avoid conflict of interest.
C. Well-Known Marks — Section 11(6) to (10)
‘Well-Known Trade Mark [Section 2(1)(zg)]’ — in relation to any goods or services, means a mark which has become so to the substantial segment of the public which uses such goods or receives such services that the use of such mark in relation to other goods or services would be likely to be taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade or rendering of services between those goods or services and a person using the mark in relation to the first-mentioned goods or services. |
A well-known mark enjoys cross-class protection — it can prevent registration or use of similar marks even in unrelated classes of goods or services. The classical doctrine is that protection extends as far as the reputation extends. Topic 31 covers well-known marks in detail; here, it is enough to note that well-known status under Section 11(6) is determined by the Registrar (or court) on the basis of factors including knowledge in the relevant section of the public, duration and extent of use, advertising and promotion, and the record of successful enforcement.
📖 Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. v. Berachah Sales Corporation, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2265 Facts — Haldiram, the iconic Indian sweets-and-namkeen manufacturer, sued an Ambala-based entity using "HALDIRAM BHUJIAWALA" / "HALDIRAM'S" for restaurant services and food items. Holding — Justice Prathiba M. Singh of the Delhi High Court (2 April 2024) granted a permanent injunction, declared HALDIRAM and its oval-shaped logo as well-known marks under Section 2(1)(zg), and awarded ₹50 lakh damages plus ₹2 lakh costs. Significance — One of the most-cited Indian decisions on well-known mark status; applied the Section 11(6) factors in detail. Confirmed Haldiram's cross-class protection across food, restaurants, eateries. |
6. Non-Conventional Marks
A. Shape Marks
Section 2(1)(zb) explicitly recognises "shape of goods, their packaging" as registrable. The Coca-Cola contour bottle is the global archetype; in India, the shape of the Zippo lighter and the ITC Aashirvaad atta pouch have been registered as shape marks. Two doctrines limit shape registration:
- Functional shapes are excluded — Section 9(3): a shape is unregistrable if it (a) results from the nature of the goods themselves, (b) is necessary to obtain a technical result, or (c) gives substantial value to the goods.
- Distinctiveness must be acquired — most shape marks register only after the proprietor demonstrates secondary meaning.
B. Colour Marks
Section 2(1)(zb) explicitly recognises "combination of colours" as registrable. Single-colour registration is more contested. The leading global example is Cadbury's purple (Pantone 2685C) for chocolate, which the UK courts have held registrable subject to acquired distinctiveness. India has been cautious; mere assertion of colour is rarely accepted, but combinations and brand-specific colour applications can succeed with strong evidence of secondary meaning.
C. Sound Marks
A sound mark is registered for a distinctive aural element associated with a brand. The Yahoo! yodel was India's first registered sound mark. Other examples: the Nokia ringtone, the Microsoft Windows startup chime, the ICICI Bank jingle. Trade Marks Rules 2017 require an MP3 file of up to 30 seconds plus the musical notation as the graphical representation.
D. Hologram Marks
Hologram marks are three-dimensional images that change appearance when viewed from different angles. They have been used as anti-counterfeiting devices on credit cards, currency notes and product authentication. Multi-angle drawings are required as the graphical representation.
E. Olfactory (Smell) Marks
Smell marks are the cutting edge — and the most controversial. The Indian CGPDT accepted the first olfactory mark registration in 2026 for a "rose-like smell". The applicant submitted a chemical formula plus textual description as the graphical representation. The decision is contested in scholarly circles for two reasons: the chemical formula does not enable the public to identify the smell precisely without scientific apparatus, and the textual description ("rose-like smell") is the real identifier. The case is likely to spark legislative review of Section 2(1)(zb).
✅ Why smell marks are hard A smell cannot be precisely captured by visual means. The EU and UK have abandoned the graphical representation requirement and now allow representation by "any appropriate form using generally available technology". India retains the strict requirement under Section 2(1)(zb). The 2026 olfactory acceptance has therefore been criticised as a dilution of the statutory requirement, with industry observers calling for a legislative amendment to formally accommodate olfactory marks. |
F. Taste, Texture, Gesture and Motion Marks
Other emerging categories — taste marks (the taste of medicine), texture marks (the feel of leather), gesture marks (a distinctive body movement in advertising), motion marks (animated logos) — have all been the subject of registration applications globally. India has not yet had any successful registration in these categories, and the graphical representation requirement remains a high bar.
7. Master Comparative Table
Category | Statutory Basis | Example | Registration Special Issue |
|---|---|---|---|
Word | Section 2(1)(zb), 2(1)(m) | TATA, INFOSYS | Most flexible — covers any visual rendering. |
Device | Section 2(1)(zb), 2(1)(m) | Mercedes star | Specific visual representation only. |
Composite | Section 2(1)(zb), 2(1)(m) | Coca-Cola wordmark + ribbon | Dominant feature analysis. |
Service | Section 2(1)(z) | HDFC BANK | Nice Classes 35-45. |
Collective | Sections 2(1)(g), 61-68 | CA mark (ICAI) | Filed by association; member regulations. |
Certification | Sections 2(1)(e), 69-78 | AGMARK, ISI | Owner cannot trade in certified goods. |
Well-known | Sections 2(1)(zg), 11(6)-(10) | TATA, GOOGLE, HALDIRAM | Cross-class protection; Section 11(6) factors. |
Shape | Section 2(1)(zb) | Coca-Cola bottle | Section 9(3) excludes functional shapes. |
Colour | Section 2(1)(zb) | Cadbury purple | Acquired distinctiveness usually required. |
Sound | Section 2(1)(zb) | Yahoo! yodel | MP3 + musical notation required. |
Hologram | Section 2(1)(zb) | Anti-counterfeit devices | Multi-angle drawings. |
Olfactory | Section 2(1)(zb) | Rose-like smell (2026 first registration) | Chemical formula + textual description; contested. |
🎯 EXAM POINTERS — TOPIC 29
|