All NotesCivil LawLaw of Trusts

Law of Trusts

Creating a Trust: The Three Certainties and the Formalities (Sections 5 and 6)

Two sections decide whether an express trust has come into existence. Section 6 states the substance: the author must indicate with reasonable certainty an intention to create a trust, its purpose, its beneficiary and its property, and (in most cases) transfer the property to the trustee. Section 5 states the form: writing and registration for immovable property, and writing or transfer of ownership for movable property, subject to an exception that prevents the rules being used as an instrument of fraud. This note examines both.

1. Section 6: How a Trust Is Created

Section 6, Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (creation of trust)

Subject to the provisions of section 5, a trust is created when the author of the trust indicates with reasonable certainty by any words or acts (a) an intention on his part to create thereby a trust, (b) the purpose of the trust, (c) the beneficiary, and (d) the trust property, and (unless the trust is declared by will or the author of the trust is himself to be the trustee) transfers the trust property to the trustee.

The section has three features worth noting at the outset. The required indication may be by words or acts, so no technical language is needed. The standard is reasonable certainty, not absolute precision. And there are effectively four certainties in the Indian formulation (intention, purpose, beneficiary, property), which correspond to the three English certainties of intention, subject matter and objects, with purpose and beneficiary together forming the certainty of objects. These were famously stated in Knight v Knight (1840) and are the foundation of the law of express trusts.

2. Certainty of Intention

The author must intend to create a trust, that is, to impose a binding obligation on the holder of the property, as opposed to making an outright gift, expressing a hope, or creating a contract, an agency or a condition. The court reads the whole instrument and the surrounding circumstances; the word "trust" is neither necessary nor conclusive.

Precatory words

Words of wish, hope, request or confidence ("precatory" words) raise the most difficult questions. The illustrations to Section 6 show that the answer depends on whether the words, read in context, are imperative and whether the other certainties are present.

Illustration to Section 6

Result

(a) A bequeaths property to B, "having the fullest confidence that he will dispose of it for the benefit of" C

A trust is created for C

(b) A bequeaths property to B "hoping he will continue it in the family"

No trust: the beneficiary is not indicated with reasonable certainty

(c) A bequeaths property to B, requesting him to distribute it among such members of C's family as B should think most deserving

No trust: the beneficiaries are not indicated with reasonable certainty

(d) A bequeaths property to B, desiring him to divide the bulk of it among C's children

No trust: the trust property is not indicated with reasonable certainty

(e) A bequeaths a shop and stock in trade to B, on condition that he pays the testator's debts and a legacy to C

This is a condition, not a trust

Illustration (a) is notable. Nineteenth century English law moved away from treating expressions of "confidence" as creating trusts, but the Indian Act, drafted in 1882, records that such words can create a trust where the beneficiary and property are clear. Courts nevertheless construe each instrument as a whole, and the modern approach in India, as in England, is to look for a genuine intention to impose an obligation rather than to rely on particular words.

Sham trusts

Intention must be real. A document that calls itself a trust deed but was never intended to bind the "trustee", for example because the author continues to deal with the property as his own, may be disregarded as a sham. This question arises frequently in tax and creditor disputes.

3. Certainty of Purpose and Beneficiary

The author must indicate what the trust is for and for whom. In a private trust, the beneficiaries must be ascertained or ascertainable: named individuals, or a class described clearly enough that it can be determined whether any given person falls within it ("my grandchildren living at my death"). Where the trustee is given a discretion to choose among a class, the class must still be defined with reasonable certainty; Illustration (c) fails because "such members of C's family as B should think most deserving" gave no workable standard. Public charitable trusts are treated more generously, because the court can supply a scheme (Topic 40).

4. Certainty of Trust Property

The property must be identified with reasonable certainty: "my house at 12 Mall Road", "500 shares of X Ltd", "the residue of my estate". Expressions such as "the bulk of my property" (Illustration (d)) fail. Where the beneficial shares are uncertain but the property is certain, the trust may fail as to the shares and the property may result to the author (Topic 33). The requirement that the property be transferable to the beneficiary is examined in Topic 10.

5. Transfer of the Property

Section 6 requires the author to transfer the property to the trustee, except in two cases: where the trust is declared by will (the property then passes on death through the testator's estate), and where the author declares himself trustee. Until the property is vested in the trustee, the trust is not completely constituted (Topic 10). The transfer must comply with the law governing the type of property: a registered conveyance for land, share transfer formalities for shares, delivery for goods.

6. Section 5: Formalities

Section 5, Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (trust of immovable and movable property)

No trust in relation to immovable property is valid unless declared by a non-testamentary instrument in writing signed by the author of the trust or the trustee and registered, or by the will of the author of the trust or of the trustee.

No trust in relation to movable property is valid unless declared as aforesaid, or unless the ownership of the property is transferred to the trustee.

These rules do not apply where they would operate so as to effectuate a fraud.

Property

Valid modes of declaration

Immovable

(1) A non-testamentary instrument in writing, signed by the author or the trustee, and registered; or (2) a will of the author or the trustee

Movable

(1) Either of the above; or (2) transfer of ownership to the trustee, which may be oral, so long as the property passes

Points of detail

  • Signature by author or trustee: the instrument may be signed by either, so a trustee's signed and registered acknowledgment that he holds land in trust satisfies the section.
  • Registration regardless of value: Section 5 requires registration of every non-testamentary declaration of trust of immovable property, whatever its value. The Registration Act, 1908 and stamp law apply in addition (Topic 12).
  • Oral trusts of movables: a person who hands over money, jewellery or shares to another, with an oral declaration of trust, creates a valid trust if ownership actually passes.
  • Wills: a trust declared by will must satisfy the formalities of a valid will under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or the applicable personal law (Topic 11).

The fraud exception

The last sentence of Section 5 prevents the formality rules being used as an instrument of fraud. If a person obtains property on the faith of an oral promise to hold it on trust, and then relies on the absence of a registered instrument to keep it for himself, the court may enforce the trust despite the lack of formality. The exception is narrow: it requires a fraudulent use of the statute, not merely a failure to comply with it. Where it does not apply, Chapter IX may still impose a resulting or constructive obligation (Part H).

7. Obligations Arising by Law Are Not Affected

Sections 5 and 6 govern express trusts. The obligations in the nature of trusts in Chapter IX, such as those arising on failure of a trust, on advantages gained by fiduciaries, or on transfers for illegal purposes, arise by operation of law and need neither writing nor registration, even when they relate to land.

⚠ Key point

Under Section 6, a trust is created when the author indicates with reasonable certainty, by words or acts, (a) an intention to create a trust, (b) its purpose, (c) the beneficiary and (d) the trust property, and transfers the property to the trustee unless the trust is by will or the author is trustee. Under Section 5, a trust of immovable property needs a registered non-testamentary instrument signed by the author or trustee, or a will; a trust of movable property needs either of these or a transfer of ownership. The rules do not apply where they would effectuate a fraud.

8. Related Topics and Provisions

  • Lawful purpose (Topic 7): Section 4
  • Parties to a trust (Topic 9): Sections 7, 9 and 10
  • Trust property and constitution (Topic 10): Section 8
  • Trust deed in practice (Topic 12): registration and stamp duty
  • Resulting trusts (Topic 33): when an attempted trust fails