Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Payment and Payment in Due Course (Sections 10, 78 and 81)

Payment is the normal end of an instrument's life. But paying the wrong person, or paying in suspicious circumstances, may not discharge the payer, who could then have to pay twice. The Act answers the payer's question, "when am I safe?", through the concept of payment in due course. This note explains Section 10, the rule that payment must be made to the holder, and the payer's right to see and receive the instrument.

1. Payment in Due Course (Section 10)

Section 10, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

"Payment in due course" means payment in accordance with the apparent tenor of the instrument in good faith and without negligence to any person in possession thereof under circumstances which do not afford a reasonable ground for believing that he is not entitled to receive payment of the amount therein mentioned.

In accordance with the apparent tenor

Payment must match what the instrument, on its face, requires: the right amount, to the right person as shown by the instrument and its indorsements, and at the right time. Payment before maturity is not in accordance with the apparent tenor, and so is not payment in due course; a holder in due course who later presents the instrument at maturity may still enforce it. A crossed cheque paid over the counter is not paid according to its tenor (Topic 34).

In good faith and without negligence

The payer must act honestly and with reasonable care. Under Section 3 of the General Clauses Act, a thing is done in good faith if done honestly, whether negligently or not, but Section 10 adds the separate requirement of absence of negligence. A bank that pays a cheque with an obvious alteration, a signature that does not match the specimen, or in breach of its own procedures, may not be paying in due course.

To a person in possession

The payee must be in possession of the instrument. For a bearer instrument, possession is enough; for an order instrument, the person must also appear entitled through regular indorsements.

No reasonable ground for suspicion

The circumstances must not give a reasonable ground for believing that the person is not entitled to payment. Notice of loss, a stop-payment instruction, an unusual request for cash, or knowledge of a dispute may defeat payment in due course.

2. To Whom Payment Must Be Made (Section 78)

Section 78, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Subject to the provisions of section 82, clause (c), payment of the amount due on a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque must, in order to discharge the maker or acceptor, be made to the holder of the instrument.

  • General rule: payment discharges the maker or acceptor only if made to the holder (Topic 12).
  • Bearer instruments (Section 82(c)): where the instrument is payable to bearer or has been indorsed in blank, a maker, acceptor or indorser who makes payment in due course is discharged to all parties, even if the person paid turns out not to be the true owner.
  • Order instruments: payment to a person claiming through a forged indorsement is not payment to the holder, and does not discharge the maker or acceptor. Banks have special statutory protection for cheques and drafts (Sections 85 and 85A; Topic 35).

3. Showing and Delivering Up the Instrument (Section 81)

Section 81, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

(1) Any person liable to pay, and called upon by the holder thereof to pay, the amount due on a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque is before payment entitled to have it shown, and is on payment entitled to have it delivered up, to him, or, if the instrument is lost or cannot be produced, to be indemnified against any further claim thereon against him.

(2) Where the cheque is an electronic image of a truncated cheque, even after the payment the banker who received the payment shall be entitled to retain the truncated cheque.

(3) A certificate issued on the foot of the printout of the electronic image of a truncated cheque by the banker who paid the instrument shall be prima facie proof of such payment.

  • Before payment: the payer may insist on seeing the instrument, to check its genuineness and the holder's title.
  • On payment: he may insist on its delivery up, so that it cannot be negotiated again to a holder in due course.
  • If lost: he may insist on an indemnity against further claims (Topic 15).
  • Truncated cheques: the collecting bank retains the paper cheque, and the paying bank's certificate on the printout of the image is prima facie proof of payment.

4. Protection Given by Payment in Due Course

  • Discharge of the instrument: payment in due course by the maker, acceptor or drawee at or after maturity discharges the instrument and ends its negotiability (Sections 60 and 82(c); Topic 24).
  • Paying bank: a bank that pays an order cheque purporting to be indorsed by the payee, or a bearer cheque to the bearer, in due course, is discharged (Section 85); similarly for drafts (Section 85A).
  • Altered instruments: a person or bank paying an instrument whose material alteration is not apparent, or a cheque whose crossing is not apparent, according to its apparent tenor and otherwise in due course, is discharged (Section 89; Topic 28).

⚠ Key point

Payment in due course is payment according to the apparent tenor, in good faith and without negligence, to a person in possession, in circumstances giving no reasonable ground to believe he is not entitled (Section 10). Payment before maturity is not in due course. To discharge the maker or acceptor, payment must be made to the holder (Section 78), except that payment in due course of a bearer or blank-indorsed instrument discharges the payer against all parties (Section 82(c)). The payer may require the instrument to be shown before payment and delivered up on payment, or an indemnity if it is lost (Section 81).

5. Related Topics and Provisions

  • Holder (Topic 12)
  • Discharge from liability (Topic 28)
  • Paying banker (Topic 35)