Indian Contract Act, 1872 (ICA)
Offer vs Invitation to Offer, and the Lapse and Revocation of an Offer: Display of Goods, Advertisements, Auctions, Tenders, Reward Offers and Sections 5 and 6 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Two questions dominate the practical law of offers, and neither is answered by Section 2(a) alone. The first is whether a given communication is a proposal at all or merely an invitation to make one, which decides who is the offeror and therefore who is free to withdraw. The second is how long an offer remains capable of acceptance and how it can be brought to an end, which Sections 5 and 6 answer in a way that differs materially from English law. This topic takes the standard commercial situations in turn and then works through the six ways in which an offer comes to an end.
1. Offer and Invitation to Offer Distinguished
An invitation to offer, also called an invitation to treat, is a communication inviting others to make proposals. It is a step in negotiation and cannot be accepted, because there is nothing in it to accept. The party issuing it becomes the offeree when a proposal is made in response, and is then free to accept or refuse. The distinction is one of intention, tested objectively: did the party signify a willingness to be bound on acceptance, or merely a willingness to receive offers?
Point of difference | Offer or proposal | Invitation to offer |
|---|---|---|
Definition | Section 2(a): signification of willingness made with a view to obtaining assent | Not defined in the Act; a judicial category covering communications inviting proposals |
Effect of a favourable response | Acceptance concludes a contract | The response is itself a proposal, which may be accepted or refused |
Who is the offeror | The party making the communication | The party responding to the communication |
Freedom to withdraw | Limited by Section 5; revocation must precede acceptance | Unrestricted, since no offer has yet been made to the party inviting |
Intention | To be bound on acceptance | To ascertain the terms on which others will deal |
Typical instances | A quotation stating willingness to sell at a price; a reward advertisement; a tender submitted in response to an invitation | Display of goods, price lists, catalogues, advertisements of auction, invitations to tender, prospectuses, railway timetables |
1.1 Display of goods
📖 Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd., [1953] 1 QB 401 (CA) Facts: A self-service chemist displayed medicines on open shelves. Customers selected items into baskets and took them to a cash desk where a registered pharmacist supervised the sale. The statute required certain sales to be effected under the supervision of a pharmacist. The question was whether the sale took place when the customer took the item from the shelf, in which case there was no supervision. Held: The Court of Appeal held that the display of goods on a shelf is an invitation to treat and not an offer. The customer makes the offer by presenting the goods at the cash desk, and the shopkeeper accepts or declines there. The sale therefore took place under the pharmacist's supervision and the statute was complied with. Ratio: Goods displayed with a price are an invitation to offer. The customer is the offeror, and the seller is free to decline, which is why a shop is not bound to sell an item marked at a mistaken price. |
1.2 Price lists, catalogues, prospectuses and timetables
The same reasoning applies to a price list or catalogue, which announces the terms on which the trader is prepared to entertain orders but does not commit him to supply anyone who responds. A commercial reason supports the rule: a trader with limited stock would otherwise be in breach the moment orders exceeded supply. A company prospectus inviting subscription for shares is likewise an invitation, the application for shares being the offer and the allotment the acceptance. A railway timetable is a statement of intended service rather than a promise to run a particular train, though once a ticket is issued a contract of carriage exists on the carrier's usual terms.
1.3 Advertisements
An advertisement is ordinarily an invitation to offer, for the same reason as a catalogue. It becomes an offer where its language shows an intention to be bound on performance rather than an intention to receive proposals. The distinction is between an advertisement offering goods for sale, which invites offers, and an advertisement promising a sum of money to anyone who does a specified act, which is a general offer accepted by performance. The reward cases and Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. fall on the second side of the line, the deposit of money in that case being treated as evidence of an intention to be bound.
1.4 Auction sales
An advertisement that an auction will be held is an invitation, and a person who travels to the sale has no claim if the auction is cancelled or the lot withdrawn, as was decided in Harris v. Nickerson, (1873) LR 8 QB 286. At the auction itself the auctioneer's request for bids is an invitation, each bid is an offer, and acceptance takes place on the fall of the hammer. It follows, as held in Payne v. Cave, (1789) 3 TR 148, that a bidder may withdraw his bid at any time before the hammer falls, since until then there has been no acceptance. Where the sale is advertised as being without reserve, the auctioneer's undertaking to sell to the highest bidder may found a separate collateral obligation.
1.5 Tenders
An invitation to tender is an invitation to offer; the tender submitted is the offer; and acceptance of the tender concludes the contract. Where the tender is for the supply of goods as and when required, its acceptance does not by itself create a contract for any quantity. It converts the tender into a standing offer, and each requisition placed under it is a separate acceptance producing a separate contract.
📖 Union of India v. Maddala Thathiah, AIR 1966 SC 1724 Facts: A tender for the supply of jaggery to a railway administration was accepted, the arrangement being for supply as and when required during a stated period. The contract contained a clause reserving to the administration the right to cancel at any time the supply of the whole or part of the balance not yet required. The administration invoked that clause after part of the period had run. Held: The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation. The acceptance of a tender for supply as required amounts to a standing offer, and the contract for each quantity arises only when a requisition is placed. The clause was construed as entitling the administration to cancel as to future requisitions not yet made, and it did not enable cancellation of supplies already ordered. Ratio: A tender for supply as and when required operates as a continuing offer. Each order creates a distinct contract, and the right to cancel, where reserved, attaches to the standing offer and not to contracts already concluded under it. |
Three settings, the same sequence: invitation, offer, acceptance
2. General Offers, Performance and Knowledge
A general offer is accepted by performing its conditions. Section 8 provides that performance of the conditions of a proposal is an acceptance of the proposal, so no prior communication of acceptance is needed. But performance counts as acceptance only if the person performing knew of the offer, because Section 2(b) requires him to signify assent, and there can be no assent to an unknown proposal.
📖 Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Datt, (1913) 11 All LJ 489 Facts: The defendant's nephew absconded from home and the defendant sent his servant, the plaintiff, to search for him. After the servant had left, the defendant issued handbills announcing a reward for anyone who traced the boy. The servant found the boy without having heard of the announcement, and later claimed the reward. Held: The Allahabad High Court dismissed the claim. Knowledge of the proposal is essential to its acceptance, and a person who performs the act in ignorance of the offer does not accept it. The plaintiff was in any event already under a duty as a servant to search for the boy, and the performance of an existing obligation was no consideration for the promised reward. Ratio: An offer cannot be accepted by a person unaware of it. Performance of the stipulated act creates a contract only where the performer acted with knowledge of and in response to the offer. |
⚠ Motive and knowledge are different questions The requirement is that the offeree knew of the offer when he performed, not that the offer was his sole or dominant reason for performing. A person who returns lost property knowing of the announced reward may recover it even though he would have returned the property anyway. What defeats the claim is ignorance of the offer, as in Lalman Shukla, or the absence of any consideration because the act was one the claimant was already legally bound to perform. |
3. How an Offer Comes to an End
An offer is not perpetual. Six events terminate it, after which it cannot be accepted unless the offeror renews it.
- Revocation by the offeror, under Section 5.
- Lapse of the time prescribed, or of a reasonable time where none is prescribed.
- Failure of a condition precedent to which acceptance was subject.
- Death or insanity of the offeror, where the fact comes to the knowledge of the offeree before acceptance, under Section 6(4).
- Rejection by the offeree, whether express or by way of a counter offer.
- Acceptance otherwise than in the prescribed mode, where the proposer insists on the prescribed mode under the proviso to Section 7.
Sections 5 and 6, Indian Contract Act, 1872 5. Revocation of proposals and acceptances. A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards. 6. Revocation how made. A proposal is revoked: (1) by the communication of notice of revocation by the proposer to the other party; (2) by the lapse of the time prescribed in such proposal for its acceptance, or, if no time is so prescribed, by the lapse of a reasonable time, without communication of the acceptance; (3) by the failure of the acceptor to fulfil a condition precedent to acceptance; or (4) by the death or insanity of the proposer, if the fact of his death or insanity comes to the knowledge of the acceptor before acceptance. |
3.1 Revocation and the Indian rule
Section 5 read with Section 4 produces a rule materially different from the English one. The communication of an acceptance is complete as against the proposer when it is put in a course of transmission so as to be out of the power of the acceptor. A proposal can therefore be revoked only until the acceptor posts his acceptance. The result is that an Indian offeror has a shorter window for revocation than an English offeror, and the acceptor enjoys a corresponding advantage: from the moment he posts, the offeror is bound, while the acceptor himself remains free to revoke until his acceptance reaches the proposer.
Revocation is effective only when communicated. A decision to withdraw, or a notice posted but not yet received, does not revoke the offer.
📖 Byrne & Co. v. Leon Van Tienhoven & Co., (1880) 5 CPD 344 Facts: The defendants posted an offer to sell tinplates on 1 October. On 8 October they posted a letter revoking it. The plaintiffs received the offer on 11 October and telegraphed acceptance the same day, confirming by letter on 15 October. The letter of revocation reached them on 20 October. Held: The court held that a contract had been concluded. A revocation has no effect until it is actually communicated to the offeree, and the posting of a revocation is not communication. The offer was therefore still open when the plaintiffs accepted, and the later arrival of the revocation could not undo the contract. Ratio: Revocation takes effect on receipt, not on despatch. The rule that treats posting as effective applies to acceptance and is not extended to withdrawal of an offer. |
3.2 Lapse of time
Where the offer prescribes a period, it lapses at its expiry. Where none is prescribed, it lapses after a reasonable time, which is a question of fact turning on the subject matter, the medium used and the state of the market. An offer to sell a commodity subject to rapid price movement lapses quickly; an offer to sell land may remain open for weeks. In Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co. v. Montefiore, (1866) LR 1 Ex 109, an application for shares made in June was held to have lapsed by the time the company purported to allot them in November.
3.3 Failure of a condition precedent
Section 6(3) provides that a proposal is revoked by the failure of the acceptor to fulfil a condition precedent to acceptance. Where the offeror stipulates that the offer may be accepted only on some condition being satisfied, such as payment of earnest money, furnishing a guarantee or obtaining an approval, an acceptance tendered without fulfilling the condition is ineffective and the offer falls.
3.4 Death or insanity of the offeror
Section 6(4) attaches a knowledge requirement that English law does not. The offer is revoked by the death or insanity of the proposer only if that fact comes to the knowledge of the acceptor before acceptance. An acceptance made in ignorance of the offeror's death is therefore effective, and the resulting contract binds the estate, subject to Section 37, which provides that promises bind the representatives of the promisor unless a contrary intention appears or the contract is one for personal performance. The death or insanity of the offeree terminates the offer in all cases, since a proposal is personal to the person addressed and cannot be accepted by his representatives.
3.5 Rejection and counter offer
An express rejection ends the offer at the moment it is communicated. A counter offer has the same effect, because Section 7 requires an acceptance to be absolute and unqualified, so a reply that varies the terms is a fresh proposal and operates as a rejection of the original. The original offer is destroyed and cannot be revived by a later purported acceptance, which is the rule in Hyde v. Wrench considered in the preceding topic. A mere inquiry or request for information is not a rejection and leaves the offer standing.
4. The Position Stated Shortly
- An invitation to offer invites proposals and cannot be accepted; the party responding to it is the offeror.
- Display of goods is an invitation, and the customer makes the offer at the cash desk, per the Boots case.
- Price lists, catalogues, prospectuses and timetables are invitations; an advertisement promising a sum for a specified act is a general offer.
- An auction advertisement is an invitation, each bid is an offer, and acceptance occurs on the fall of the hammer, so a bid may be withdrawn until then.
- A tender for supply as and when required is a standing offer; each order is a separate acceptance, per Union of India v. Maddala Thathiah.
- Performance of the conditions of a proposal is acceptance under Section 8, but only where the performer knew of the offer, per Lalman Shukla.
- Section 5 permits revocation only until the acceptance is put in a course of transmission, which gives the Indian offeror a shorter window than the English rule.
- Revocation is effective on receipt and not on despatch, per Byrne v. Van Tienhoven.
- An offer lapses on expiry of the prescribed time or, failing that, of a reasonable time, which is a question of fact.
- Death or insanity of the proposer revokes the offer under Section 6(4) only if known to the acceptor before acceptance; death of the offeree ends it in every case.
5. Related Topics and Provisions
Topic or provision | Connection |
|---|---|
Offer or Proposal under Section 2(a): Essentials and Kinds of Offer | The companion topic covering the definition, the essentials, and express, implied, specific, general, standing, cross, counter and conditional offers |
Types of Contracts | Unilateral contracts formed by performance of a general offer |
Important Concepts and Definitions under the Indian Contract Act | Proposal and promise in the definitional chain |
Scheme of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 | Chapter I, Sections 3 to 9 |
Section 3, Indian Contract Act | Modes of communication |
Section 4, Indian Contract Act | Completion of communication and the Indian postal rule |
Section 5, Indian Contract Act | Revocation of proposals and acceptances |
Section 6, Indian Contract Act | The four modes by which a proposal is revoked |
Section 7, Indian Contract Act | Acceptance absolute and unqualified; prescribed mode |
Section 8, Indian Contract Act | Acceptance by performing the conditions of a proposal |