Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) Act, 2013

Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction and Appeal to the Supreme Court (Sections 37 and 38)

Having created a specialist route for disputes, from the adjudicating officer to the Securities Appellate Tribunal, the PFRDA Act protects that route in two ways. Section 37 keeps civil courts out of matters assigned to the specialist bodies and bars injunctions against action under the Act. Section 38 provides a single further appeal, to the Supreme Court, on questions of law.

1. Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction (Section 37)

Section 37, PFRDA Act, 2013

No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which an adjudicating officer appointed under this Act or a Securities Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under this Act to determine and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act.

Two limbs

  • Jurisdiction: a civil court cannot entertain a suit or proceeding on a matter which an adjudicating officer or the SAT is empowered to determine. The test is whether the matter falls within their power, not whether they have actually dealt with it.
  • Injunctions: no court or other authority may grant an injunction in respect of action taken or to be taken under any power conferred by or under the Act.

2. Reach and Limits of the Bar

  • Express exclusion: Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 allows civil courts to try all civil suits unless their cognizance is expressly or impliedly barred. Section 37 is an express bar.
  • Strict construction: exclusion of civil court jurisdiction is not readily inferred. Under the principles in Dhulabhai v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1968), where a statute gives finality to the orders of special tribunals and provides an adequate remedy, civil courts are excluded, but they retain jurisdiction where the provisions of the Act have not been complied with or the tribunal has not acted in conformity with the fundamental principles of judicial procedure.
  • Matters outside the Act: disputes that the adjudicating officer and SAT cannot determine, such as succession among heirs to a deceased subscriber's corpus or ordinary contractual disputes between private parties, remain with the civil courts.
  • Writ jurisdiction unaffected: the bar does not and cannot limit the writ jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 226 or of the Supreme Court under Article 32, which are part of the basic structure, as held in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997). Courts, however, usually expect the statutory appeal to be used first.

⚠ Note

The injunction limb is wider than the jurisdiction limb. It extends to "any court or other authority" and to "any action" under the Act, not only matters for the adjudicating officer or SAT. It does not, however, prevent the SAT from staying an order in an appeal, since the Tribunal's powers come from the Act itself, nor does it restrict constitutional courts exercising writ jurisdiction.

3. Appeal to the Supreme Court (Section 38)

Section 38, PFRDA Act, 2013 (substance)

Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the Supreme Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal to him on any question of law arising out of such order. Provided that the Supreme Court may, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the said period, allow it to be filed within a further period not exceeding sixty days.

  • Who: any person aggrieved by a decision or order of the SAT, including the Authority.
  • Scope: only questions of law arising out of the order. Findings of fact by the Tribunal are ordinarily final, unless perverse or based on no evidence, which itself raises a question of law.
  • Time: sixty days from communication of the order, extendable by a further sixty days at most for sufficient cause. The outer limit of one hundred and twenty days cannot be extended further.
  • Direct to the Supreme Court: there is no intermediate appeal to a High Court.

4. The Complete Route of Challenge

  1. Adjudicating officer and member: inquiry and imposition of penalty under Sections 28 and 30; or an order of the Authority under its other powers.
  2. Securities Appellate Tribunal: appeal on facts and law within 45 days (Section 36).
  3. Supreme Court: appeal on questions of law within 60 days, extendable by 60 days (Section 38).

Alongside this route, writ petitions lie against the Central Government's decisions under the Act, against regulations, and in exceptional cases against orders of the Authority, for example where it acts wholly without jurisdiction or in breach of natural justice.

5. Questions Arising

Can a subscriber file a civil suit against a pension fund for loss?

It depends on the matter. Where the claim rests on a breach of the Act or regulations that the adjudicating officer or SAT is empowered to determine, Section 37 bars the suit. A claim based on an independent private law right that the Act does not deal with may still be brought in a civil court.

Can a High Court stay a PFRDA order in a writ petition?

Yes, in principle, because Article 226 is not subject to Section 37. But where an effective appeal lies to the SAT, a High Court will ordinarily decline to interfere and leave the party to that remedy.

⚠ Key point

Under Section 37, no civil court may entertain any suit or proceeding on a matter that an adjudicating officer or the SAT is empowered to determine, and no court or other authority may grant an injunction against action under the Act. The bar is express (Section 9 CPC), read strictly under Dhulabhai (1968), does not cover matters outside the Act such as succession, and cannot affect writ jurisdiction (L. Chandra Kumar, 1997). Under Section 38, any person aggrieved by a SAT order may appeal to the Supreme Court on a question of law within 60 days of communication, extendable by 60 days for sufficient cause.

6. Related Topics and Provisions

  • Appeal to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (Section 36)
  • Adjudication of penalties (Section 30)
  • Rights of subscribers
  • Public servants, good faith and other laws (Sections 47, 48 and 55)