Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) Act, 2013
NPS, EPF and PPF Compared
For most Indian savers, retirement planning involves three long-term instruments: the National Pension System (NPS), the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) and the Public Provident Fund (PPF). They differ in their legal basis, who may join, how money is invested, how returns are determined, when money can be withdrawn and how it is taxed. This note compares them attribute by attribute.
1. Legal Basis and Administration
- NPS: the PFRDA Act, 2013 and PFRDA regulations; run by registered intermediaries under PFRDA, with the Ministry of Finance.
- EPF: the Code on Social Security, 2020 (replacing the EPF Act, 1952) and the EPF Scheme, 2026; administered by the EPFO under the Ministry of Labour and Employment.
- PPF: a Government small savings scheme, now under the Government Savings Promotion Act, 1873 and the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 2019; operated through banks and post offices for the Ministry of Finance.
2. Who May Join
- NPS: compulsory for Central (and most State) Government employees recruited after 2004; voluntary for any citizen aged 18 to 70, including non-residents and OCIs; NPS Vatsalya for minors.
- EPF: compulsory for employees of covered establishments (20 or more employees) within the wage ceiling; not available to the self-employed.
- PPF: any resident Indian individual, including for a minor; non-residents cannot open new accounts.
3. Contributions
- NPS: Government employees 10% plus Government 14%; others voluntary, with Tier I minimum of ₹1,000 a year and no maximum.
- EPF: generally 12% of wages from the employee and 12% from the employer, part of the employer's share going to the EPS.
- PPF: between ₹500 and ₹1.5 lakh a year.
4. Investment and Returns
- NPS: market-linked; invested by pension funds in equity, corporate debt and Government securities, by the subscriber's choice; returns vary and are not guaranteed.
- EPF: an interest rate declared annually by the EPFO's Central Board of Trustees and approved by the Government; 8.25% for 2025-26.
- PPF: a Government-set rate reviewed quarterly; 7.1% for October to December 2026, unchanged for several years.
- Risk: the NPS carries market risk; EPF and PPF give sovereign or quasi-sovereign certainty of return.
5. Liquidity and Exit
- NPS: locked in until sixty or normal exit; up to four partial withdrawals of 25% of own contributions; at exit, 20% (non-government) or 40% (Government) must buy an annuity, unless the corpus is small.
- EPF: partial withdrawals for specified purposes; full withdrawal on retirement or after a period of unemployment; no compulsory annuity, though the EPS pays a separate monthly pension.
- PPF: fifteen-year lock-in, extendable in blocks of five years; partial withdrawals and loans in the interim; full withdrawal at maturity with no annuity.
6. Taxation
- NPS: contributions deductible within limits (employer contributions even under the default regime); returns tax-free; 60% of the exit corpus exempt; annuity income taxable.
- EPF: contributions deductible under the old regime; interest exempt within limits, but interest on employee contributions above ₹2.5 lakh a year (₹5 lakh where there is no employer contribution) is taxable; withdrawals after five years of continuous service are exempt.
- PPF: exempt-exempt-exempt: deductible contributions (old regime), tax-free interest and tax-free maturity.
7. Strengths and Weaknesses
- NPS: low cost, portability, choice and potentially higher long-term returns through equity; but market risk, compulsory annuitisation and less favourable tax at exit.
- EPF: compulsory saving, assured interest and employer contribution; but limited to formal employment, with early withdrawals reducing retirement savings.
- PPF: safety, full tax exemption and availability to the self-employed; but a low annual limit, long lock-in and returns that may lag inflation-adjusted equity returns over long periods.
In practice the three are complementary rather than alternatives. A salaried employee may hold EPF compulsorily, add NPS for equity exposure and tax benefits, and use PPF for a fully tax-free, risk-free component.
⚠ Key point The NPS (PFRDA Act, market-linked, compulsory for Government employees and voluntary for others aged 18 to 70), the EPF (Code on Social Security, 12% + 12%, declared interest of 8.25% for 2025-26, compulsory for covered establishments) and the PPF (PPF Scheme, 2019, ₹500 to ₹1.5 lakh a year, 7.1% for October to December 2026, fifteen-year lock-in) differ in risk, liquidity and tax. The NPS offers equity, low cost and portability but requires partial annuitisation and taxes annuity income; EPF gives assured interest and employer contributions; PPF is fully tax-exempt and risk-free but small. They work best together. |
8. Related Topics and Provisions
- EPF and the Code on Social Security, 2020
- Taxation of the NPS
- Exit, withdrawal and annuity under the NPS
- Investment choice and minimum assured return schemes