POCSO Act, 2012
The POCSO Act and the New Criminal Codes: BNS, BNSS and BSA
On 1 July 2024 the three codes of the general criminal law were replaced. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code; the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure; and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 replaced the Indian Evidence Act. The POCSO Act was not repealed or renumbered. It continues as a special law, and its offences, procedure and presumptions apply as before. What changed is the general law around it. These notes set out how the two now fit together.
The provisions that matter most for a POCSO case, old number to new
1. The Governing Principle
§ A special law and three general codes The POCSO Act is a special law, and the new codes are general laws. Where the special law makes provision, it governs; where it is silent, the general law fills the gap. Section 42A makes the point expressly: the Act is in addition to and not in derogation of any other law, but where there is an inconsistency, the POCSO Act prevails. Section 42 deals with overlap in punishment: where an act is an offence under the POCSO Act and also under the general penal law, the offender is liable to the punishment greater in degree. The references in the Act. The POCSO Act still names provisions of the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, for instance in Sections 25 and 42. By Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, a reference to a repealed provision that has been re-enacted is read as a reference to the provision so re-enacted, so those references now point to the corresponding provisions of the new codes. |
2. The POCSO Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Indian Penal Code | Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita | Relevance to a POCSO case |
|---|---|---|
s. 375 and s. 376 | s. 63 and s. 64 | Rape and its punishment. The BNS offence protects a WOMAN; POCSO protects any CHILD, of any sex |
s. 375 sixthly | s. 63 sixthly | Intercourse with a woman below EIGHTEEN, with or without her consent, is rape. The age is the same as in POCSO |
s. 375 Exception 2 | s. 63 Exception 2 | The marital exception, which now applies only where the wife is NOT UNDER EIGHTEEN, giving statutory form to Independent Thought |
s. 376AB and s. 376DA, 376DB | s. 65 and s. 70 | Aggravated punishment for rape of a woman under sixteen and under twelve, and for gang rape of a woman under eighteen |
s. 354 and s. 509 | s. 74 and s. 79 | Assault with intent to outrage modesty, and words or gestures intended to insult modesty; overlap with sexual assault and sexual harassment under POCSO |
s. 377 | No equivalent | Unnatural offences were not carried into the BNS |
§ The consequence of the omission of Section 377 The BNS has no provision corresponding to Section 377. For an adult male victim of non-consensual penetration, the general law now contains no specific offence. For a boy, POCSO fills the space entirely. Penetrative sexual assault under Section 3 of the POCSO Act is defined by reference to a child, of any sex, so the protection of a male child is unaffected. The practical point for an answer. Before 2024 a prosecution for abuse of a boy might add charges under Section 377. After 2024, the POCSO Act is the principal protection, which makes its gender neutrality more important than ever. |
3. The POCSO Act and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
Code of Criminal Procedure | Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita | Relevance to a POCSO case |
|---|---|---|
s. 154 | s. 173 | Registration of information. The BNSS recognises a ZERO FIR, registered irrespective of where the offence was committed, and information by electronic means |
s. 164 | s. 183 | Statement before a Magistrate. POCSO s. 25 requires the Magistrate to record the child's statement AS SPOKEN BY THE CHILD |
s. 164A | s. 184 | Medical examination of a victim of rape, read with POCSO s. 27 on the examination of a child |
s. 173(1A) | s. 193(2) | Investigation of offences under POCSO ss. 4, 6, 8 and 10 to be completed within TWO MONTHS from the recording of the information |
s. 357A | s. 396 | The victim compensation scheme, applied in quantifying compensation under POCSO s. 33(8) |
s. 482 | s. 528 | The inherent power of the High Court, invoked in petitions to quash POCSO proceedings |
§ Where the special procedure still governs • Recording the statement. Sections 24 to 26 of the POCSO Act, on where, by whom and how the child's statement is recorded, apply as special provisions alongside the BNSS. • The trial. Sections 33 to 38, on the child-friendly trial, in-camera proceedings, the child not seeing the accused, and the time limits in Section 35, continue to govern the Special Court. • The court. Offences under the Act are tried by the Special Court designated under Section 28, not by the court that would be competent under the general law. |
4. The POCSO Act and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Indian Evidence Act | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam | Relevance to a POCSO case |
|---|---|---|
s. 118 | s. 124 | Competency of witnesses. A child is competent if able to understand the questions put and to give rational answers; there is no minimum age |
s. 53A | s. 48 | In prosecutions for sexual offences, evidence of the victim's character or previous sexual experience is not relevant on the question of consent |
s. 114A | s. 120 | Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecutions for rape |
s. 65B | s. 63 | Admissibility of electronic records, critical in offences under POCSO ss. 13 to 15 |
📖 Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra, (1997) 5 SCC 341 The Supreme Court held that a child witness, if found competent to depose to the facts and reliable, may be relied upon, and that the evidence of a child witness does not require corroboration as a rule of law. The rule of prudence is that the court should scrutinise such evidence with care, since a child may be susceptible to tutoring, and should satisfy itself that the child understood the questions and gave rational answers. Rule: the test is competence and reliability, not age. The principle continues under Section 124 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. |
§ The POCSO presumptions sit above the general law of evidence Section 29 of the POCSO Act: where a person is prosecuted for committing, abetting or attempting an offence under Sections 3, 5, 7 or 9, the Special Court shall presume that he committed it, unless the contrary is proved. Section 30: in a prosecution for an offence requiring a culpable mental state, the court shall presume its existence, and the accused may prove that he had no such mental state; the fact is proved only when established beyond reasonable doubt, and not merely by a preponderance of probability. These are special presumptions, stronger than anything in the general law, and they are unaffected by the replacement of the Evidence Act. But they are not free-standing. They arise only once the prosecution has proved the foundational facts, including that the victim was a child and that the accused was connected with the act. |
5. The POCSO Act and the General Criminal Law Compared
Basis | General criminal law | The POCSO Act |
|---|---|---|
Victim | The sexual offences largely protect a WOMAN | Protects any CHILD below eighteen, of any sex |
Consent | Absence of consent is an ingredient of rape for an adult woman | Consent is legally irrelevant where the victim is a child |
Structure | Offences defined largely by the act | Graded offences, aggravated by the position of the offender and the circumstances |
Burden | The prosecution proves every ingredient beyond reasonable doubt | Sections 29 and 30 raise presumptions of guilt and of culpable mental state once foundational facts are proved |
Reporting | No general duty to report | Section 19 makes reporting mandatory, and Section 21 punishes failure |
Court | The court competent under the BNSS | A designated Special Court under Section 28 |
Procedure | The ordinary trial | A child-friendly trial under Sections 33 to 38, in camera and within fixed time limits |
Media | General protection of identity in certain sexual offences | Section 23 bars disclosure of any particular that may identify the child |
Punishment overlap | Not applicable | Section 42: the punishment greater in degree applies |
6. Landmark Points
- The new codes came into force on 1 July 2024; the POCSO Act was not repealed or renumbered.
- Section 42A. The Act is in addition to other laws and prevails over them to the extent of inconsistency.
- Section 8, General Clauses Act, 1897. References in POCSO to the old codes are read as references to the corresponding new provisions.
- BNS s. 63 Exception 2. The marital exception applies only where the wife is not under eighteen.
- The BNS has no equivalent of Section 377, which makes POCSO the principal protection for a male child.
- BNSS s. 193(2). Investigation of offences under POCSO ss. 4, 6, 8 and 10 within two months.
- BSA s. 124. A child is a competent witness if able to understand questions and give rational answers; Dattu Ramrao Sakhare, (1997) 5 SCC 341.
- POCSO ss. 29 and 30. The special presumptions continue unaffected by the new Evidence code.
7. Frequently Asked Questions
Did the new criminal codes repeal or change the POCSO Act?
No. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam replaced the general codes from 1 July 2024, but the POCSO Act continues as a special law with its offences, procedure and presumptions intact.
How are references in POCSO to the IPC and CrPC read now?
By Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, a reference to a repealed and re-enacted provision is read as a reference to the new provision. So a reference to Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in POCSO Section 25 is read as a reference to Section 183 of the BNSS.
What is the significance of the omission of Section 377 from the BNS?
The general law no longer has a specific offence for non-consensual penetration of an adult male. For a boy, POCSO fills the space, since penetrative sexual assault under Section 3 protects any child of any sex.
What is the time limit for investigating a POCSO offence?
Under Section 193(2) of the BNSS, which carries forward Section 173(1A) of the old Code, the investigation of offences under Sections 4, 6, 8 and 10 of the POCSO Act is to be completed within two months from the date the information was recorded.
Can a young child be a witness?
Yes. Under Section 124 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, corresponding to Section 118 of the old Act, a child is competent if able to understand the questions put and give rational answers. There is no minimum age, and corroboration is not required as a rule of law.
Do the POCSO presumptions still apply?
Yes. Sections 29 and 30 are special provisions of the POCSO Act and are unaffected by the replacement of the Evidence Act. They arise once the prosecution has proved the foundational facts.
What happens if the same act is an offence under POCSO and the BNS?
Section 42 of the POCSO Act provides that the offender is liable to the punishment greater in degree. The special law is not a route to a lighter sentence.
8. Related Topics in This POCSO Series
- The POCSO Act, 2012: Introduction, Object and Scope
- Consent of the Child and the Age of Consent under POCSO
- The POCSO Act, the Child Marriage Act and the Juvenile Justice Act
- Nature and Scheme of the POCSO Act, and Important Definitions