Company Law
19 Nidhi Company
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013
A R T I C L E 1 9 |
Nidhi Company
Types of Companies — Mutual Benefit Form
Sec 406 STATUTE Companies Act 2013 | Members ONLY Lending+borrowing | Nidhi RULES 2014 Compliance regime |
For Judicial Service Aspirants & Law Students RJS DJS PCS-J HJS UPJS BJS MPCJ |
— Corporate form for mutual-benefit lending among members —
Nidhi Company — Mutual Benefit Finance in Corporate Form
Introduction
The Nidhi Company is one of the oldest and most distinctive financial-corporate forms in Indian law — predating modern banking regulation by several decades, drawing on traditional South Indian community-finance practices that go back to the late 19th century. The word 'Nidhi' (निधि) means 'treasure' or 'fund' in Sanskrit, and the institution embodies the idea of a closed-membership mutual-benefit fund where members borrow from and deposit with their own collective pool. Nidhi Companies operate under Section 406 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Nidhi Rules, 2014 (as substantially amended in 2019 and 2022). They sit at the intersection of corporate law and financial-services regulation, but uniquely, they are regulated primarily by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) — not by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) — although the RBI retains certain residual oversight powers.
This article examines the Nidhi Company comprehensively — its origins, statutory framework, formation procedure, capital and net-owned-funds requirements, members-only operating principle, deposit and loan ceilings, branch expansion rules, restrictions, distinctive features, recent regulatory tightening, and the practical issues that surround this niche but commercially significant form. With over 20,000 Nidhi Companies registered in India (concentrated heavily in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Kerala — reflecting the form's deep cultural roots in South India), the Nidhi Company is a significant component of India's informal-formal financial intermediation landscape.
Part I — Origin and Historical Context
South Indian Roots
Nidhi-type institutions emerged in the latter half of the 19th century in the Madras Presidency (now Tamil Nadu) and adjacent regions of South India. These were community-based mutual-benefit funds — often organised around a temple, a caste association, a professional guild, or a family lineage — where members contributed regular sums and could borrow from the pool when needed. They served populations underserved by formal banking, providing small-ticket savings and credit on terms calibrated to community context.
The first formal Nidhi was the Madras Permanent Fund, established in 1873. Several others followed — the Madras Bank, the Madras Provincial Cooperative Bank, and various regional Nidhis. Over time, these institutions grew in number and economic significance. By the early 20th century, Nidhis were a recognised form of financial intermediation in colonial India.
Statutory Recognition
Nidhi Companies received statutory recognition under Section 620A of the Companies Act, 1956 — which empowered the Central Government to declare any company to be a 'Mutual Benefit Society' (Nidhi Company). Specific notifications under Section 620A applied to Nidhi Companies, granting them exemptions from certain provisions of the 1956 Act in exchange for compliance with prescribed conditions. The Companies Act, 2013, replaced this with Section 406 and the comprehensive Nidhi Rules, 2014.
Part II — Statutory Framework
Section 406 — The Empowering Provision
Section 406(1) — 'Nidhi Company' means a company which has been incorporated as a Nidhi with the object of cultivating the habit of thrift and savings amongst its members, receiving deposits from, and lending to, its members only, for their mutual benefit, and which complies with such rules as are prescribed by the Central Government for regulation of such class of companies.
The provision identifies four core elements:
- Incorporation as a Nidhi under the Companies Act;Object of cultivating thrift and savings amongst members;Operations limited to receiving deposits from, and lending to, members only;Compliance with prescribed rules (Nidhi Rules, 2014).
Nidhi Rules, 2014 — The Operational Framework
The Nidhi Rules, 2014, notified under Section 406(2), contain the detailed regulatory framework. They have been substantially amended — most significantly by:
- Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2019 — strengthened minimum-capital and net-owned-fund requirements; introduced the Form NDH-4 declaration regime;
- Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2022 — further tightened the regime, particularly regarding branch expansion, dividend distribution, and acceptance of deposits.
Part III — Formation Requirements
Public Company Form (Rule 4)
A Nidhi Company must be incorporated as a public company under the Companies Act, 2013 — not as a private company. This is a distinctive feature: although Nidhi operations are member-only and resemble a private mutual fund, the corporate form must be public — reflecting the depositor-protection rationale (greater disclosure and governance under public-company rules).
Minimum Capital Requirements (Rule 5)
- Minimum paid-up equity share capital: ₹10 lakh (raised from earlier ₹5 lakh by 2019 amendment);
- No preference shares can be issued;
- Minimum 7 members at incorporation (since public company).
Net Owned Funds (NOF)
- 'Net Owned Funds' means aggregate of paid-up equity share capital + free reserves, less accumulated losses and intangible assets;
- A Nidhi Company must achieve NOF of at least ₹20 lakh within one year of incorporation;
- NOF-to-deposits ratio must remain at least 1:20 (i.e., deposits cannot exceed 20 times NOF) — the fundamental prudential ratio for Nidhi Companies.
Membership Threshold
- Minimum 200 members within one year of incorporation (rule 5);
- Failure to achieve 200-member threshold within one year + extension period leads to declaration as non-Nidhi by the Central Government — and the company can no longer operate as a Nidhi.
Naming
Every Nidhi Company shall have the words 'Nidhi Limited' as part of its name (Rule 6) — a statutory-branding requirement that immediately identifies the entity's character. This is a public-company naming with the additional 'Nidhi' word.
Part IV — Procedure for Formation
Step-by-Step Process
- Obtain Digital Signature Certificates (DSC) for the proposed directors and subscribers;Obtain Director Identification Numbers (DIN) for the proposed directors;Reserve the company name through Part A of SPICe+ — the name must include 'Nidhi Limited' (e.g., 'XYZ Nidhi Limited');Prepare draft Memorandum of Association — main objects must clearly state cultivating thrift and savings amongst members and providing financial services to members only;Prepare draft Articles of Association — incorporating Nidhi-specific provisions on membership, deposit and loan operations, branch expansion, and other restrictions;File SPICe+ Part B with all annexed forms (DIR-2, INC-9, MoA in Form INC-33, AoA in Form INC-34) and supporting documents (registered office proof, identity and address proofs, etc.);Pay applicable fees;Receive Certificate of Incorporation along with PAN, TAN, and other associated registrations;Within one year of incorporation, achieve minimum 200 members and NOF of ₹20 lakh, then file Form NDH-1 (return of statutory compliances);Form NDH-2 (application for extension if 200-member or ₹20-lakh-NOF threshold not met within one year) — to the Regional Director;Form NDH-4 (application for declaration as Nidhi) — must be filed within 120 days of completing the 200-member, ₹20-lakh-NOF, and 1:20 ratio thresholds;Without NDH-4 filing, the Central Government's recognition as a Nidhi is incomplete — and the company cannot continue Nidhi operations after the prescribed period.
Form NDH-4 — The Declaration Regime
The Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2019, introduced the requirement of Form NDH-4 — a declaration by the company seeking the Central Government's confirmation that it qualifies as a Nidhi. Without this confirmation, a company cannot continue Nidhi operations. As of mid-2022, the MCA initiated a comprehensive review of NDH-4 filings — declaring several thousand entities as 'not Nidhi Companies' for failure to comply with the declaration regime. This has been one of the most consequential regulatory tightening exercises in the Nidhi Company space.
Part V — Operational Framework
Members-Only Principle
This is the foundational operational principle. A Nidhi Company can:
- Accept deposits ONLY from its members;
- Lend ONLY to its members;
- No deposits or loans from/to non-members under any circumstances.
Membership is open to any individual who applies and is accepted by the Board, subject to articles. Membership is not open to body corporates, trusts, or partnerships — only individuals can be members. Minor cannot be a member; deposits in a minor's name (through guardian) are limited and special.
Board Resolution for Membership
All admissions to membership must be approved by the Board of Directors (Rule 13). The Board may delegate this to a committee, but ultimate accountability lies with the Board. This contrasts with ordinary public companies where shareholding is freely transferable subject only to share-transfer rules.
Deposit Operations
Nidhi Companies can accept deposits in the following forms (Rule 11):
- Fixed Deposits — up to 5 years;
- Recurring Deposits — up to 5 years;
- Savings Deposits — daily/monthly/quarterly basis.
Deposit ceilings:
- Total deposits cannot exceed 20 times NOF (the 1:20 ratio);
- Savings deposits — maximum ₹1 lakh per member at any time;
- Interest rates on deposits must not exceed those declared by RBI for NBFCs;
- Deposit insurance — Nidhi deposits are NOT covered under DICGC (unlike bank deposits, which have DICGC coverage of ₹5 lakh per depositor);
- Premature withdrawal — permitted as per articles, with prescribed penalty rates.
Lending Operations
Nidhi Companies can lend only against:
- Gold, silver, or jewellery;
- Immovable property (subject to 50% LTV cap);
- Fixed deposits and other instruments held with the Nidhi Company;
- Government securities, insurance policies.
Loan ceilings (Rule 15):
- Where total deposits are less than ₹2 crore — maximum loan to a member: ₹2 lakh;
- Where total deposits are ₹2 crore to ₹20 crore — maximum loan to a member: ₹7.5 lakh;
- Where total deposits are ₹20 crore to ₹50 crore — maximum loan to a member: ₹12 lakh;
- Where total deposits are ₹50 crore or more — maximum loan to a member: ₹15 lakh.
Loan tenure typically does not exceed 7 years; immovable property loans are subject to 50% LTV cap and other prudential conditions.
Part VI — Restrictions on Nidhi Companies
Rule 6 of the Nidhi Rules, 2014 lists 16 specific restrictions. A Nidhi Company shall NOT:
- Carry on the business of chit fund, hire purchase finance, leasing finance, or insurance;Acquire or sell any other company's securities;Issue preference shares, debentures, or any other debt instrument;Open any current account with its members;Acquire another company by purchase of securities or control of management without prior approval of the Regional Director;Carry on any business other than the business of borrowing or lending in its own name;Accept deposits from or lend to any non-member;Pledge any assets lodged by its members as security;Take deposits from or lend money to any body corporate;Enter into any partnership arrangement in its borrowing or lending activities;Issue or cause to be issued any advertisement in any form for soliciting deposit;Pay any brokerage or incentive for mobilising deposits from members or for granting loans;Open branches outside Tamil Nadu without prior approval of the Regional Director (special restriction reflecting the historic concentration);Carry on any business other than that prescribed for Nidhis;Engage in any activity contrary to the Nidhi Rules;Operate against the interests of its members or the public.
These restrictions reflect the prudential intent — confining Nidhi Companies to their core mutual-benefit lending-and-deposit business, preventing them from morphing into more complex (and riskier) financial entities.
Part VII — Branch Expansion (Rule 10)
Branch expansion is heavily regulated:
- A Nidhi Company can open branches only after generating profits in the preceding 3 consecutive years;
- After meeting the profit condition, a Nidhi can open up to 3 branches without prior Regional Director approval, in the same district;
- Beyond 3 branches in a district, or for branches in another district or state, prior Regional Director approval is required;
- Closure of branches — prior approval of Regional Director and notice to members.
This branch-expansion restriction is among the strictest in any Indian financial-services regulatory regime, reflecting the close-knit, locality-based mutual-benefit philosophy of Nidhi Companies.
Part VIII — Governance and Disclosure
Board of Directors
- Minimum 3 directors (since public company); Maximum 15 (extendable);
- Independent directors — required if the Nidhi Company meets the prescribed thresholds (paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 crore, etc.);
- Director's relatives cannot be appointed as directors of the same Nidhi Company;
- Tenure restrictions — maximum 10 consecutive years; cooling-off period of 2 years thereafter.
Audit and Financial Reporting
- Standard audit under Sections 139–148;
- Auditor rotation as per Section 139(2);
- Annual financial statements — full statutory format;
- Form NDH-1 (return of statutory compliances) — within 90 days of FY-end;
- Form NDH-3 (half-yearly return) — twice a year, within 30 days of half-year-end;
- Form NDH-4 (declaration as Nidhi) — within 120 days of meeting thresholds.
Annual General Meetings
Standard public-company AGM provisions apply, with no specific Nidhi exemptions. Members vote on financial statements, dividend declaration (if any), director appointments, and statutory matters.
Dividend
Nidhi Companies can declare dividends, subject to:
- Maximum 25% of paid-up share capital (more restrictive than ordinary companies);
- Equal amount transferred to general reserve;
- Profits required for the past 3 years for the dividend to be issued;
- Adequate retained earnings for member-deposit safety.
Part IX — Regulatory Architecture
MCA as Primary Regulator
Unlike most financial-services entities, Nidhi Companies are primarily regulated by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (through the Registrar of Companies, the Regional Director, and the Central Government), not by the RBI. This reflects the historical position that Nidhi operations are essentially mutual-benefit savings-and-loan within a closed membership — closer to a co-operative model than a commercial-banking model.
RBI's Limited Role
The RBI does not directly regulate Nidhi Companies, but retains residual powers:
- Authority to issue directions affecting Nidhi Companies if their operations threaten financial stability;
- Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and KYC compliance — applicable through Prevention of Money-Laundering Act (PMLA);
- Reporting to FIU-IND for suspicious transactions.
Inter-Agency Coordination
- Income-tax Department — for tax compliance;
- State-level co-operative regulators — for entities transitioning between forms;
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) — in cases of large-scale Nidhi fraud (deposit-mobilisation Ponzis often masquerade as Nidhis);
- State police and CID — for criminal investigations.
Part X — Tax Treatment
Nidhi Companies are taxed as ordinary domestic companies under the Income-tax Act:
- Corporate income tax at standard rates (currently 22% concessional under Section 115BAA, plus surcharge and cess);
- Interest income from member loans — taxable as business income;
- Interest paid to depositors — deductible as business expense;
- TDS on interest paid to depositors — applicable under Section 194A;
- Dividend distribution tax — abolished in 2020; dividend now taxable in the hands of recipients;
- No specific tax holiday or concessional regime for Nidhi Companies (unlike Section 80PA for Producer Companies).
Part XI — Comparison with Related Entities
Feature | Nidhi Company | Co-operative Society | NBFC | Bank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Governing Law | Sec 406 + Nidhi Rules 2014 | State Cooperative Acts / MSCS Act 2002 | RBI Act + NBFC Regulations | Banking Regulation Act 1949 |
Primary Regulator | MCA | State Cooperative Registrar / Central Registrar | RBI | RBI |
Form | Public company under Companies Act | Society under Cooperative Acts | Various — public/private company | Banking company / public-sector / private bank |
Min. Capital | ₹10 lakh + ₹20 lakh NOF in 1 year | Specified in respective state act | ₹2 crore (NBFC-ND); ₹5+ crore for some types | ₹500-2000 crore for new-private banks |
Customer Base | Members only | Members only (typically) | General public | General public |
Deposit Insurance | NO (not under DICGC) | Limited (DICGC for some) | NO (NBFCs don't take retail deposits typically) | Yes (DICGC up to ₹5 lakh) |
Branch Expansion | Heavily restricted (Rule 10) | Per cooperative laws | RBI permission required | RBI licence required |
Activities Permitted | Member deposits + member loans only | Per object clause; broader | Lending, investments, FoPs | Full banking — accept demand and time deposits, payment systems, etc. |
Part XII — Recent Developments
Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2019
The 2019 Amendment was a watershed in Nidhi regulation:
- Increased minimum paid-up capital from ₹5 lakh to ₹10 lakh;
- Tightened NOF requirement (₹20 lakh within one year);
- Introduced Form NDH-4 declaration regime — without which a company cannot continue Nidhi operations;
- Strengthened branch expansion conditions;
- Required minimum 200 members within one year (with extension on application).
Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2022
The 2022 Amendment further tightened:
- Restricted dividend distribution further (max 25%, with conditions);
- Stricter conditions on transfer of immovable property received as security on default;
- Strengthened compliance reporting and audit requirements;
- Tightened the regime for declaring Nidhi-fraud entities.
MCA's NDH-4 Crackdown (2022-2024)
Following the introduction of Form NDH-4, the MCA initiated a comprehensive review of Nidhi Company filings. Several thousand entities were declared 'not Nidhi Companies' for failure to file NDH-4 or for non-compliance with the prescribed conditions. This has dramatically reduced the number of officially recognised Nidhi Companies and forced a large-scale clean-up of the sector.
Action Against Pseudo-Nidhi Frauds
Several high-profile Nidhi-fraud cases have emerged, particularly in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana, involving entities that operated as Nidhis without proper recognition or that violated deposit ceilings. These have led to depositor losses, criminal prosecutions, and SFIO investigations. Notable examples include the Sarada Group scam (West Bengal), various Tamil Nadu Nidhi failures, and Andhra-Pradesh-based Nidhi-Ponzi entities. The MCA's Nidhi-clean-up initiative has been driven, in part, by these fraud experiences.
Part XIII — Notable Cases
📖 RBI v. Pearless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., (1995) 5 SCC 100 Supreme Court considered the regulatory framework for finance companies and the boundary between RBI-regulated NBFCs and other forms of mutual-benefit finance. The decision is important for understanding the conceptual distinction between Nidhi Companies (MCA-regulated) and NBFCs (RBI-regulated) — particularly in cases where an entity straddles the boundary. |
📖 Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. v. SEBI, (2012) 10 SCC 603 While primarily a securities-law case, Sahara is instructive on the boundaries between mutual-benefit savings schemes and unauthorised public deposit-mobilisation. The reasoning has implications for Nidhi Companies that crossed into prohibited territory by accepting deposits from non-members or running affiliated entities outside the Nidhi framework. |
📖 Saradha Realty India Ltd. v. State of West Bengal — Saradha Group Cases The Saradha Group scam (which surfaced in 2013) involved entities that operated as deposit-mobilisation schemes resembling Nidhi-Ponzi structures. The investigation revealed how unregulated and pseudo-Nidhi entities can defraud depositors. The aftermath led to the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2013, and similar state-level laws — demonstrating how state legislatures have responded to the deposit-fraud phenomenon parallel to MCA's Nidhi-Rules amendments. |
📖 Various NCLT and Regional Director Decisions Numerous NCLT and RD decisions have addressed (a) declaration as non-Nidhi for Form NDH-4 non-compliance; (b) winding-up petitions involving failed Nidhi Companies; (c) member disputes over deposit refund; (d) loan recovery from defaulting members. The decisions illustrate the practical challenges of regulating closed-membership financial institutions. |
Part XIV — Practical Issues and Compliance
Common Compliance Pitfalls
- Failure to achieve 200 members or ₹20 lakh NOF within one year — leading to declaration as non-Nidhi;
- Non-filing of Form NDH-4 within 120 days — leading to MCA action;
- Crossing the 1:20 deposit-to-NOF ratio — prudential breach;
- Accepting deposits from or lending to non-members — fundamental violation of the members-only principle;
- Engaging in prohibited activities — chit fund, hire purchase, leasing, insurance;
- Branch expansion without Regional Director approval;
- Issuing preference shares or debentures (prohibited);
- Inadequate compliance with KYC and AML requirements;
- Inadequate documentation of member admissions and transactions.
Best Practices
- Maintain a robust member registration and admission process with clear board approvals;
- Track NOF, deposit-to-NOF ratio, and member count regularly to ensure prudential compliance;
- File all NDH forms on time and accurately;
- Maintain clear segregation between member-only operations and any other business activities (which should be avoided entirely);
- Implement strong internal audit and risk management;
- Comply with KYC, AML, PMLA, and FIU-IND reporting requirements;
- Obtain professional advice on complex transactions like immovable property security enforcement, branch expansion, etc.;
- Avoid offering returns that significantly exceed market rates — a frequent indicator of pseudo-Nidhi-Ponzi behaviour.
Strategic Considerations
The Nidhi form is suitable when:
- The promoters wish to organise mutual-benefit finance for a defined community (geography, profession, caste, etc.);
- Operations will be confined to deposit-taking from and lending to members;
- There is a stable membership base of at least several hundred individuals;
- Promoters are willing to operate within branch-expansion restrictions and prudential norms.
The Nidhi form is unsuitable when:
- Public deposit-taking is contemplated — Nidhi must remain member-only;
- Wide product offering is needed — chit fund, hire purchase, leasing, insurance are prohibited;
- Aggressive geographic expansion is planned — Nidhi has heavy branch restrictions;
- Body-corporate clients or non-individual depositors are contemplated;
- The intended scale exceeds Nidhi's prudential ceilings (₹15 lakh max loan, 1:20 ratio, etc.).
In such cases, alternative forms — NBFC, banking company, payment-bank, small-finance-bank — should be considered.
Part XV — Exam-Focused Summary
📌 Core Principles to Remember (1) Section 406 + Nidhi Rules, 2014 — governing framework. (2) Origin — South Indian community-finance institutions of late 19th century; first formal Nidhi was Madras Permanent Fund (1873). (3) Object — cultivate thrift and savings amongst members; receive deposits from and lend to members ONLY. (4) Form — public company (Rule 4); name ends 'Nidhi Limited' (Rule 6). (5) Capital and NOF — minimum ₹10 lakh paid-up capital + ₹20 lakh NOF within one year + 200 members within one year. (6) Deposit-to-NOF ratio: 1:20 (deposits cannot exceed 20× NOF). (7) Deposit ceilings — savings deposits max ₹1 lakh per member; FDs and RDs up to 5 years. (8) Loan ceilings — based on deposit base: ₹2 lakh (deposits < ₹2 cr); ₹7.5 lakh (₹2-20 cr); ₹12 lakh (₹20-50 cr); ₹15 lakh (>₹50 cr). (9) Loans only against gold/silver/jewellery, immovable property (50% LTV cap), FDs, govt securities, insurance policies. (10) 16 prohibitions in Rule 6 — no chit fund, no hire purchase, no leasing, no insurance, no preference shares/debentures, no advertising, no non-member dealings, no body corporate dealings, etc. (11) Branch expansion — needs 3 years of profit + Regional Director approval beyond 3 branches in same district. (12) Forms — NDH-1 (annual return); NDH-2 (extension); NDH-3 (half-yearly); NDH-4 (declaration as Nidhi within 120 days of meeting thresholds). (13) Primary regulator — MCA (NOT RBI); RBI has only residual oversight. (14) NO deposit insurance under DICGC. (15) Concentrated in Tamil Nadu and South India; ~20,000 entities registered. (16) Nidhi (Amendment) Rules 2019 and 2022 — major tightening, NDH-4 introduction, MCA crackdown. (17) Cases: RBI v. Pearless; Sahara Real Estate; Saradha Group. |
Part XVI — Conclusion
The Nidhi Company stands at a fascinating crossroads — drawing on a century-and-a-half-old tradition of South Indian community finance, formalised within modern corporate-law structures, and regulated through a hybrid MCA-led framework that distinguishes it from both ordinary companies and conventional financial institutions. For closed-membership communities seeking organised mutual-benefit finance — temple trusts, professional associations, ethnic communities, geographic localities — the Nidhi form offers a tested, statutorily-recognised vehicle with limited liability, perpetual succession, and statutory governance discipline.
Yet the form is also demanding and constrained. The members-only operating principle, the deposit-to-NOF prudential ceiling, the loan-size restrictions tied to deposit base, the heavily-restricted branch expansion regime, and the 16-item prohibition list together create a tight box within which Nidhi Companies must operate. Recent regulatory tightening — through the 2019 and 2022 Amendment Rules, the Form NDH-4 declaration regime, and MCA's enforcement crackdown — has substantially narrowed the gap between the law on the books and the law in practice. Pseudo-Nidhi entities masquerading as legitimate mutual-benefit organisations have been progressively cleaned up.
For the judicial aspirant, mastery of the Nidhi Company framework requires understanding both the conceptual model (closed-membership mutual benefit) and the prudential architecture (capital, NOF, ratios, ceilings, restrictions). Section 406, the Nidhi Rules 2014 (as amended), the various NDH forms, and the regulatory enforcement landscape should all be familiar. The form's distinctive features — public-company structure for member-only operations, MCA regulation rather than RBI, restrictions that go beyond ordinary corporate law — make it a frequent topic in examinations and an interesting illustration of how Indian corporate law accommodates traditional community-finance institutions within modern statutory frameworks.
📚 Related Thematic Notes (1) OPC vs Private vs Public — Nidhi must be public. (2) Producer Company — parallel mutual-benefit hybrid for primary producers. (3) Section 8 Company — charitable form. (4) Co-operative Societies — parallel framework under State and Multi-State laws. (5) NBFCs and Banking Companies — alternative financial-services forms regulated by RBI. (6) Deposit Acceptance Framework — Sections 73-76 of Companies Act and parallel rules. |