SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
Section 15A: Rights of Victims and Witnesses
For most of Indian criminal law's history, the victim was a witness in someone else's case: the State prosecuted, the accused defended, and the person who had suffered the crime waited outside the courtroom. Chapter IVA, inserted by the 2015 Amendment Act, changed that for atrocity cases. Section 15A, in twelve sub-sections, makes the State responsible for protecting victims and witnesses, guarantees dignified treatment, gives the victim notice of every proceeding and a right to be heard at every critical stage, and requires relief, rehabilitation and video recording. The Supreme Court has held its notice and hearing provisions mandatory. This note takes Section 15A sub-section by sub-section, and ends with Hariram Bhambhi, Lakshmanan and the consequences of non-compliance.
Figure 1: Section 15A at a glance: twelve sub-sections, six promises
1. The Victim-Centric Nature of Section 15A
Section 15A treats the victim as an active stakeholder in the criminal process, not a source of evidence. The 'victim' is defined widely in Section 2(1)(ec): any Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe individual who has suffered physical, mental, psychological, emotional or monetary harm or harm to property as a result of an offence under the Act, including relatives, legal guardians and legal heirs. The Supreme Court has recognised the same participatory idea in the general law: a victim has participatory rights from the stage of investigation until the end of appeal or revision, and the State's presence is not a substitute for hearing the victim (Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra, 2022). Section 15A puts that principle into statute for atrocity cases.
💡 Analogy: from the gallery to the table Before 2016 the atrocity victim sat in the public gallery, watching lawyers decide her case. Section 15A pulls up a chair for her at the table: she must be told when the case is listed, she can ask for documents and witnesses, and she must be heard before the accused is let out on bail or discharged. She does not run the prosecution, but she can no longer be ignored. |
2. Protection: Section 15A(1), (6)(a), (7), (8) and (9)
Section 15A(1) It shall be the duty and responsibility of the State to make arrangements for the protection of victims, their dependents, and witnesses against any kind of intimidation or coercion or inducement or violence or threats of violence. |
- The State's duty. Protection is a duty, not a favour. It covers victims, their dependants, and witnesses.
- Five threats named. Intimidation (fear through threats), coercion (compulsion), inducement (money, land, jobs or other offers to turn hostile), violence, and threats of violence. Inducement matters as much as force: many atrocity cases collapse because a witness is offered a settlement.
- Protection order by the Special Court. Section 15A(6)(a) requires the court to provide complete protection to secure the ends of justice, and Section 15A(7) requires the State to report the protection given, which the court periodically reviews.
- Relocation. Section 15A(6)(d) provides for relocation of a victim, dependant, informant or witness.
- Protection of identity. Under Section 15A(8), the court may conceal the names and addresses of witnesses in its orders, judgments and public records, and may direct non-disclosure of their identity and addresses.
- Immediate complaint against harassment. Under Section 15A(8)(c), the court may take immediate action on a complaint of harassment of a victim, informant or witness and, if necessary, pass protection orders the same day. The inquiry into such a complaint is tried separately and concluded within two months; where the complaint is against a public servant, the court shall restrain him from interfering with the victim or witness in any matter, related or unrelated to the case, except with its permission.
- Duty to record complaints of intimidation. Section 15A(9) requires the Investigating Officer and the Station House Officer to record any complaint of intimidation, coercion, inducement, violence or threats, oral or written, and to give a photocopy of the FIR immediately and free of cost.
3. Fair Treatment, Respect and Dignity: Section 15A(2)
Section 15A(2) A victim shall be treated with fairness, respect and dignity and with due regard to any special need that arises because of the victim's age or gender or educational disadvantage or poverty. |
- Age-specific needs. Child victims and the elderly need special arrangements: support persons, breaks in testimony, examination at home or in child-friendly rooms.
- Gender-specific needs. Women victims of sexual offences need women officers, privacy in recording statements and medical examination, and protection from humiliating cross-examination.
- Educational disadvantage. Many victims cannot read the FIR or follow court proceedings. Documents must be explained in a language the victim understands, which ties to the duty in Section 4(2)(a) to read out the information before taking the signature.
- Poverty and special needs. Travel and maintenance expenses, daily allowances and legal aid ensure that poverty does not keep the victim out of the courtroom.
4. Right to Notice: Section 15A(3)
Section 15A(3) A victim or his dependent shall have the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any Court proceeding including any bail proceeding and the Special Public Prosecutor or the State Government shall inform the victim about any proceedings under this Act. |
- Reasonable. Given in a form and at a place the victim can actually receive it.
- Accurate. Correct date, court, time and nature of the proceeding.
- Timely. Early enough to allow the victim to attend or instruct counsel.
- Any court proceeding, including bail. The words are wide. They include regular and anticipatory bail, bail appeals under Section 14A(2), discharge and sentencing.
- Duty of the Special Public Prosecutor or State. The burden of notice lies on the prosecution. The Allahabad High Court has held that default in serving notice is the State's failure and cannot be visited on the accused, and set timelines for service (Ajeet Chaudhary v. State of U.P., 2021).
- Mode of notice. The Rajasthan High Court has accepted notice by SMS or WhatsApp, with screenshots placed on record (Ramesh Bairwa v. State, 2025).
5. Right to Participate: Section 15A(4) and (5)
Production of documents, summoning witnesses and examination of persons
Section 15A(4) A victim or his dependent shall have the right to apply to the Special Court or the Exclusive Special Court, as the case may be, to summon parties for production of any documents or material, witnesses or examine the persons present. |
The victim can apply for production of documents, for summoning of witnesses the prosecution has left out, and for examination of persons present in court. The decision rests with the court, which applies the usual test of whether the evidence is essential to a just decision.
Right to be heard
Section 15A(5) A victim or his dependent shall be entitled to be heard at any proceeding under this Act in respect of bail, discharge, release, parole, conviction or sentence of an accused or any connected proceedings or arguments and file written submission on conviction, acquittal or sentencing. |
Figure 2: Section 15A(5): where the victim must be heard
- Bail. The most litigated stage. The victim can point to threats, the accused's influence, and the risk to witnesses. The Gujarat High Court has upheld Section 15A(3) as mandatory, but held that a hearing under Section 15A(5) is not mandatory where the court has first thoroughly verified that the allegations disclose only bailable offences (Hemal Ashwin Jain v. Union of India, 2020).
- Discharge. Before the accused is released from the charge, the victim can show why the material discloses the offence.
- Release and parole. Any proceeding for the release of the accused, or the parole of a convict.
- Conviction and sentence. The victim can argue on guilt and on the sentence, and file written submissions on conviction, acquittal and sentencing.
- Connected proceedings. Proceedings connected with these stages, such as appeals under Section 14A. The Madras High Court has held that a habeas corpus petition against the accused's preventive detention is not a proceeding under the Act or a connected proceeding (Vinothini v. Additional Chief Secretary, 2023).
6. Relief, Rehabilitation and Information: Section 15A(6), (11) and (12)
- Travel and maintenance expenses. The Special Court must provide travelling and maintenance expenses during investigation, inquiry and trial (Section 15A(6)(b)); Rule 11 fixes the scale and requires payment immediately and in any case within three days.
- Social and economic rehabilitation. The court provides socio-economic rehabilitation during investigation, inquiry and trial (Section 15A(6)(c)); Rule 12(4B) lets the Special Court order it.
- The State's scheme. Section 15A(11) requires the State to specify a scheme ensuring fourteen entitlements, including a free copy of the FIR, immediate relief in cash or kind, protection, relief for death, injury or damage, food, water, clothing, shelter, medical aid, transport and daily allowances, maintenance, and legal aid.
- Victim's access to FIR. A free copy of the recorded FIR (Section 15A(11)(a)), in addition to the copy under Section 15A(9) of any FIR on a complaint of intimidation.
- Access to charge-sheet and information about investigation. Information on the status of investigation and charge-sheet, and a free copy of the charge-sheet (Section 15A(11)(i)).
- Information about relief. Information on the relief amount (Section 15A(11)(k)).
- Information about trial. Advance information about the dates and place of investigation and trial (Section 15A(11)(l)), and adequate briefing and preparation for trial with legal aid (Section 15A(11)(m)).
- Assistance. The victim may take assistance from NGOs, social workers or advocates (Section 15A(12)).
7. Video Recording: Section 15A(10)
Section 15A(10) says: 'All proceedings relating to offences under this Act shall be video recorded.' The Bombay High Court has held the requirement mandatory, including for bail hearings, directing the State to equip courts, while allowing courts without facilities to proceed where liberty is at stake (Hema Suresh Ahuja v. State of Maharashtra, 2024). The Delhi High Court applied it even to sexual offences, with dummy names, face masking or pixelation to protect identity, prospectively (Laxmi Narayan v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2024). The recording protects victims and witnesses from later claims that they said something else, and deters intimidation in court.
8. Mandatory Notice and Hearing: the Leading Cases
Figure 3: Bail and the victim: testing compliance with Section 15A
📖 Hariram Bhambhi v. Satyanarayan (decided 29 October 2021) Facts: In a murder case involving offences under the Act, the Rajasthan High Court granted bail without notice to the complainant under Section 15A(3). Held: A bench of D.Y. Chandrachud and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. (per Chandrachud, J.) held that sub-sections (3) and (5) of Section 15A are mandatory. The victim must receive notice and be heard; a later hearing, for instance on an application for cancellation, does not cure the defect. The Court observed that atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are not a thing of the past, and set the bail aside. Ratio: A bail order passed without notice to and hearing of the victim is vitiated. |
📖 Lakshmanan v. State through Deputy Superintendent of Police, 2025 INSC 1483 (decided 19 December 2025) Facts: The accused were charged with a caste-based assault under Section 3(2)(va) and attempt to murder. While on bail, some of them were accused of murdering the injured eyewitness in that case. The Madras High Court again granted bail and directed a joint trial of both crimes. The victim's family challenged the orders, arguing among other things that their objections had not been properly considered under Section 15A. Held: A bench of B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan, JJ. (per Mahadevan, J.) reaffirmed that Section 15A(3) and (5) are mandatory, but explained their reach: Section 15A guarantees an opportunity to be heard, not a right to a favourable outcome or to a detailed adjudication of every objection. A bail order is vitiated under Section 15A where there was no notice, the victim was excluded, or audience was denied; a complaint about the quality of reasoning is not a Section 15A violation. On the facts the victim had been heard. The Court nevertheless set aside the bail as perverse, because the High Court ignored the earlier cancellation of bail, the murder of the witness, the accused's antecedents and the gravity of the offences, and it set aside the joint-trial direction as beyond a bail court's remit. Ratio: Non-compliance with Section 15A vitiates a bail order; compliance does not immunise a perverse one. |
Effect of non-compliance with Section 15A
- Bail order passed without hearing the victim. Liable to be set aside as vitiated (Hariram Bhambhi, 2021). The Kerala High Court, relying on the same principle, has described such a bail order as non est (State of Kerala v. Anu, 2026, reported).
- No cure by later hearing. Hearing the victim at the cancellation stage does not validate the original order.
- Interim arrangements. The Bombay High Court has held that a court may grant interim bail while issuing notice to the victim, so long as the final decision awaits the hearing (Sahil Ramesh Sonavane v. State, 2026).
- No right to a particular result. Where the victim was heard, disagreement with the reasoning must be raised as ordinary grounds of perversity or illegality, not as a Section 15A breach (Lakshmanan, 2025).
⚠ Practice point for courts and prosecutors Record on the order sheet how and when notice was served on the victim, whether the victim appeared, and what was argued. A single line, 'victim served by SMS on (date); appeared through counsel; heard', can save the order in appeal. |
9. Quick Revision and Memory Aids
- 'P-D-I-P-S-T'. Protection, Dignity, Information, Participation, Support, Transparency: the six promises of Section 15A.
- 'Five threats'. Intimidation, coercion, inducement, violence, threats of violence (Section 15A(1)).
- 'Age, gender, education, poverty'. The special needs in Section 15A(2).
- 'Reasonable, accurate, timely'. The three qualities of notice (Section 15A(3)).
- 'Bail, discharge, release, parole, conviction, sentence'. Where the victim must be heard (Section 15A(5)).
- 'Hariram: no notice, no bail. Lakshmanan: hearing, not victory'. The two leading cases.
10. Frequently Asked Questions
Does the victim have to be heard before anticipatory bail is granted?
Yes. Section 15A(3) covers any bail proceeding, and Section 15A(5) the hearing on bail. Remember that anticipatory bail is itself barred by Section 18 where a prima facie case is made out (Prathvi Raj Chauhan, 2020).
Can a court grant bail if the victim cannot be traced?
The prosecution must make genuine efforts and record them. Where the State defaults in serving notice despite reasonable time, courts have refused to let the accused suffer indefinitely for the State's failure (Ajeet Chaudhary, 2021).
Does Section 15A give the victim a right to a copy of the charge-sheet?
Yes. The State's scheme must provide a free copy of the charge-sheet under Section 15A(11)(i).
Are witnesses entitled to protection even if they are not victims?
Yes. Section 15A(1) covers witnesses, and Section 15A(6), (8) and (9) expressly cover witnesses and informants.
If the victim was heard but the court ignored her objections, is the bail order void?
Not under Section 15A. It may still be set aside if it ignores relevant factors or is perverse (Lakshmanan, 2025).
11. Related Topics and Provisions
- Topic 8: Victim-Centric Justice. The constitutional basis of victim rights.
- Topic 30: Section 14A. The victim in appeals.
- Topic 31: Section 15. The prosecutor's duty to inform the victim.
- Section 2(1)(ec); Section 15A(1) to (12); Rules 11 and 12. The provisions discussed.