IPR
Topic 138 Trade Marks Registry
Topic 138 — Trade Marks Registry Procedure
The Trade Marks Registry handles trademark registrations under the Trade Marks Act 1999, Trade Marks Rules 2017, and Madrid Protocol provisions for international applications. Headquartered in Mumbai with branches in Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, and Ahmedabad, the Registry processes ~470,000 applications annually — making India among the top 5 globally. The 2017 Rules modernised the framework and introduced Madrid system integration. The Trade Marks Rules 2019 + 2020 amendments refined the framework. The trademark registration procedure: APPLICATION (Section 18 + Form TM-A) → EXAMINATION (Section 9 absolute + Section 11 relative grounds) → ACCEPTANCE OR REFUSAL → PUBLICATION in Trade Marks Journal → OPPOSITION (Section 21 — within 4 months) → REGISTRATION (Section 23) → 10-YEAR TERM renewable. Recent reforms: Trade Marks (Amendment) Rules 2017 — comprehensive overhaul; introduction of well-known mark recognition framework (Rule 124); reduced fee structure for individuals/startups/SMEs; e-filing mandatory; expedited examination provisions; consolidated TM-A form (replaced multiple TM forms). The 45 NICE CLASSIFICATION classes (33 goods + 11 services + class 45 services) form the basis. India joined Nice Agreement 7 May 2019 — formally adopting international classification. India joined Vienna Agreement 7 May 2019 — figurative element classification. India joined Locarno Agreement (Designs) 7 May 2019. The Madrid Protocol (since 8 July 2013) operates parallel framework for international trademarks. The Madras HC IP Division (April 2023) and Delhi HC IP Division (2021) handle Section 91-92 appeals from Registry decisions (post-IPAB abolition). Recent watershed cases: Pernod Ricard v. Karanveer (2025 INSC 981) composite test; Cadila 2001 confusion test; ITC Limited v. Britannia Industries (2017 Del HC) trade dress; Toshiba v. Tosiba 2024 (Del HC); Mars v. Cadbury "CELEBRATIONS" 2025; WOW Momo v. WOW Burger 2025. This topic walks through the complete Trade Marks Registry procedure — application, examination, opposition, registration, post-registration management, and recent developments.
1. Trade Marks Registry Foundational Framework
A. Statutory Framework
- Trade Marks Act 1999 — primary statute.
- Trade Marks Rules 2017 — procedural framework.
- Trade Marks Rules 2019 + 2020 — amendments.
- Madrid Protocol provisions integrated.
- Section 3 — Registrar; Section 4 — Trade Marks Registry.
B. Registry Structure
Branch | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|
Mumbai (HQ) | Maharashtra, Gujarat, Goa, Daman/Diu/Dadra Nagar Haveli, Madhya Pradesh. |
Delhi | Delhi, UP, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Chandigarh, Rajasthan. |
Kolkata | West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, Jharkhand, North-East states. |
Chennai | Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Puducherry, Lakshadweep, A&N Islands. |
Ahmedabad | Western Indian sub-region. |
2. The Trademark Registration Procedure
A. Stage 1 — Application (Section 18)
✅ Application Stage WHO MAY APPLY: · Individual persons. · Companies (registered under Companies Act). · Partnerships + LLPs. · HUFs. · Trusts + societies. · Foreign nationals + entities (with Indian agent). FORM TM-A: · Consolidated form (replaces old TM-1, TM-3, TM-8, TM-9, TM-50, TM-51, TM-66, TM-67). · Single form for various trademark types. · e-filing mandatory. DETAILS REQUIRED: · Applicant details. · Trade mark representation. · Class of goods/services (Nice Classification). · Date of first use (if applicable). · Goods/services description. · User affidavit (if claiming use). FEES: · Individual/Startup/SME: ₹4,500 per class. · Other applicants: ₹9,000 per class. · e-filing rebate. |
B. Stage 2 — Filing Receipt and Allotment
- Application number assigned.
- Filing date recorded.
- Priority claim (if any) acknowledged.
- Auto-generated receipt.
C. Stage 3 — Examination (Sections 9 + 11)
✅ Examination Stage ABSOLUTE GROUNDS (Section 9): · Section 9(1)(a) — Marks devoid of distinctive character. · Section 9(1)(b) — Descriptive marks. · Section 9(1)(c) — Common in trade/customary. · Section 9(2)(a) — Marks of nature (deceiving). · Section 9(2)(b) — Hurts religious sentiments. · Section 9(2)(c) — Scandalous/obscene matter. · Section 9(2)(d) — Use prohibited under Emblems Act 1950. RELATIVE GROUNDS (Section 11): · Section 11(1) — Identical/similar to earlier mark for identical/similar goods. · Section 11(2) — Conflict with earlier mark having reputation in India. · Section 11(3) — Use prohibited by other law. · Section 11(4) — No consent from earlier proprietor. EXAMINATION REPORT (FER): · Issued within 12-18 months typically. · Documents adverse findings. · Applicant must respond within 30 days (extendable). · Hearing rights available. |
D. Stage 4 — Acceptance or Refusal
- If acceptable, mark proceeds to publication.
- If refused, applicant can request hearing.
- Section 18 — Registrar's power to refuse/accept.
- Appeal lies to HC IP Division (Section 91-92).
E. Stage 5 — Publication (Section 20)
- Mark published in Trade Marks Journal.
- Triggers opposition window.
- Public notice of pending registration.
- Online journal accessible.
3. Opposition Procedure (Section 21)
A. Foundational Framework
✅ Opposition Procedure WHO CAN OPPOSE: · Any person. · Within 4 months from journal publication. · Form TM-O. · Fee: ₹2,700 (individual/SME) to ₹9,000 (others). GROUNDS: · Same as examination (absolute + relative grounds). · Section 9 + Section 11. · Plus Section 18 procedural grounds. PROCEDURE: 1. Notice of opposition (Form TM-O). 2. Counter-statement by applicant (Form TM-O within 2 months). 3. Opponent's evidence (within 2 months). 4. Applicant's evidence (within 2 months). 5. Opponent's rejoinder (within 2 months). 6. Hearing. 7. Registrar's decision. STATISTICS: · ~10-15% of applications opposed. · Brand monitoring critical. · Many resolved through settlement. |
B. Common Opposition Grounds
Ground | Description |
|---|---|
Section 9(1)(a) | Devoid of distinctive character. |
Section 9(1)(b) | Descriptive of goods/services. |
Section 11(1) | Identical/similar earlier mark. |
Section 11(2) | Conflict with reputed mark. |
Section 11(3) | Use prohibited by law. |
Section 18(1) | Procedural infirmity. |
Section 47 | Non-use ground. |
Common law | Passing off claim. |
4. Registration and Term
A. Registration (Section 23)
- Certificate of Registration issued.
- Date of registration = date of application.
- Section 28 — exclusive rights.
- Section 29 — infringement framework.
- Section 30 — limitation on infringement.
B. Term of Registration (Section 25)
- Initial 10 years from registration date.
- Renewable indefinitely in 10-year increments.
- Renewal fee: ₹9,000 (individual/SME) to ₹18,000 (others) per class.
- 6-month grace period for renewal (Section 25(3)).
- Late renewal: ₹3,500 + restoration fee.
C. Removal for Non-Use (Section 47)
- Continuous non-use for 5 years can lead to removal.
- "Person aggrieved" can apply for removal.
- Form TM-O (cancellation petition).
- Critical for active brand maintenance.
5. International Classification
A. Nice Classification (45 Classes)
- Goods: Classes 1-34 (34 classes).
- Services: Classes 35-45 (11 classes).
- India joined Nice Agreement 7 May 2019.
- 11th Edition currently used.
- Updated periodically.
B. Vienna Classification
- Classification of figurative elements.
- India joined Vienna Agreement 7 May 2019.
- Used for trademark searches.
- Helps identify potential conflicts.
C. Locarno Classification
- Classification of industrial designs.
- India joined Locarno Agreement 7 May 2019.
- Coordinated with Hague Geneva Act.
- 32 classes; 219 sub-classes.
6. Madrid Protocol Integration
A. India as Receiving Office
- Indian Trade Marks Registry acts as Office of Origin.
- Indian applicants file Indian application first.
- Then international application.
- Designations to other Madrid members.
- Trade Marks Rules 2017 framework.
B. India as Designated Country
- Foreign applicants can designate India through Madrid.
- Indian Registry examines under Indian law.
- 12-18 month refusal period.
- National opposition procedure available.
C. Strategic Use
- Indian businesses leveraging Madrid for international expansion.
- India ranks 7-8 globally for Madrid applications.
- Cost-effective for multi-country protection.
- Single management framework.
7. Well-Known Marks Recognition
A. Section 11(6)-(10) + Rule 124
✅ Well-Known Mark Procedure (Rule 124) INTRODUCED 2017 RULES: · Specific procedure for well-known mark recognition. · Form TM-Z. · Fee: ₹1,00,000 per mark. FACTORS CONSIDERED (Section 11(6)): · Knowledge in relevant section of public. · Duration, extent + geographical area of use. · Promotion + publicity. · Registration history. · Successful enforcement record. · Value of mark. ADVANTAGES OF WELL-KNOWN STATUS: · Cross-class protection. · Article 6bis Paris Convention protection. · Strong enforcement. · Premium licensing value. INDIAN WELL-KNOWN MARKS: · Tata, Reliance, Bajaj, Wipro. · Rolls Royce, Mercedes-Benz, BMW. · Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Nike. · Microsoft, Apple, Google. |
B. Coca-Cola v. Bisleri 2009
- Article 6bis Paris Convention application.
- Cross-product brand protection.
- Well-known mark framework.
8. Recent Trade Mark Cases
📖 Pernod Ricard India v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra, 2025 INSC 981 Background — Pernod Ricard ("BLENDERS PRIDE", "IMPERIAL BLUE") vs. Karanveer Singh Chhabra ("LONDON PRIDE"). Holding — Supreme Court (August 2025): Refined COMPOSITE TEST. Cadila 2001 reaffirmed over Dyechem 2000. Significance — RECENT REAFFIRMATION of composite test for trademark confusion. |
📖 Mars Inc. v. Cadbury "CELEBRATIONS", 2025 (Del HC) Facts — 25-year trademark dispute over "CELEBRATIONS" branding. Settlement — Court-annexed mediation under Mediation Act 2023. Outcome — Both parties to coexist with modified usage. Significance — Demonstrates Mediation Act 2023 in operation. |
📖 WOW Momo v. WOW Burger, 2025 (Del HC) Facts — Composite mark "WOW" extended to multiple food categories. Holding — Delhi HC: Secondary meaning + cross-product extension. Significance — Modern composite mark + brand extension framework. |
9. Strategic Considerations
✅ For trademark applicants — eight points For class selection, leverage 45-class Nice framework. For descriptive marks, demonstrate distinctiveness through use. For multi-class applications, evaluate cost vs. coverage. For oppositions, monitor Trade Marks Journal regularly. For Madrid integration, leverage cost savings for international. For renewal, plan within 6-month grace period. For non-use, maintain active commercial use evidence. For well-known status, document reputation systematically. |
✅ For trademark holders — six points For brand monitoring, leverage online tools + watch services. For oppositions, prepare prima facie evidence. For renewals, use 10-year cycle. For licensing, leverage Section 36-40 framework. For passing off, prepare common law evidence. For mediation, leverage Mediation Act 2023 framework. |
10. Memory Aid — Quick Recall
✅ Quick Recall — Trade Marks Registry Procedure Trade Marks Act 1999 + Rules 2017 + 2019/2020 amendments. Registry HQ Mumbai; branches Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, Ahmedabad. ~470,000 applications annually; India among top 5 globally. Section 18 Form TM-A — application. Section 9 + 11 — absolute + relative grounds. Section 21 — opposition within 4 months from publication. Section 23 — registration; Section 25 — 10-year term renewable. Section 47 — non-use removal. Section 28 — exclusive rights; Section 29 — infringement. Section 11(6)-(10) + Rule 124 — well-known marks. 45 Nice Classes (34 goods + 11 services + class 45). India joined Nice + Vienna + Locarno on 7 May 2019. Madrid Protocol since 8 July 2013. Pernod Ricard 2025 INSC 981 — composite test. WOW Momo 2025; Mars-Cadbury 2025 mediation. |
🎯 EXAM POINTERS — TOPIC 138
|