Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Section 80 Notice and Cause of Action Distinguished

The two are connected but they are not the same thing, and the connection is what makes them confusing. A cause of action is a matter of substance: the bundle of facts the plaintiff must prove to obtain a judgment. A notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is a matter of procedure: a condition precedent to suing the Government or a public officer, which must state that cause of action and be followed by two months' wait. One exists whether or not the other is ever given. These notes separate them.

The cause of action, the notice, the two-month wait, and the suit

1. Section 80

§ Section 80, CPC 1908 (in substance)

(1) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), no suit shall be instituted against the Government or against a public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official capacity, until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been delivered to, or left at the office of, the officer named in the section, and, in the case of a public officer, delivered to him or left at his office; stating the cause of action, the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff and the relief which he claims; and the plaint shall contain a statement that such notice has been so delivered or left.

(2) A suit to obtain an urgent or immediate relief against the Government or a public officer may be instituted, with the leave of the Court, without serving such notice; but the Court shall not grant relief in the suit, whether interim or otherwise, except after giving the Government or the public officer a reasonable opportunity of showing cause.

(3) No suit instituted against the Government or a public officer shall be dismissed merely by reason of any error or defect in the notice, if in such notice the name, description and residence of the plaintiff had been so given as to enable the appropriate authority or the public officer to identify the person serving the notice, and such notice had been delivered or left at the proper office, and the cause of action and the relief claimed had been substantially indicated.

2. The Cause of Action

§ What it is, and what it does

• The definition. Every fact which it would be necessary for the plaintiff to prove, if traversed, in order to support his right to the judgment of the court. It does not include the evidence by which those facts are proved.

• It fixes when limitation begins, since time ordinarily runs from the accrual of the cause of action.

• It fixes where the suit may be filed. Under Section 20(c), a suit may be instituted where the cause of action wholly or in part arises.

• It must appear in the plaint. Order VII Rule 1(e) requires the plaint to state the facts constituting the cause of action and when it arose, and Order VII Rule 11(a) requires rejection where the plaint does not disclose one.

• It exists independently of any notice. A cause of action accrues by the operation of facts and law; whether a notice is required depends on who is being sued.

3. The Two Compared

Basis

Cause of action

Section 80 notice

Nature

SUBSTANTIVE: the facts giving the right to sue

PROCEDURAL: a condition precedent to instituting the suit

Against whom it matters

In every suit

Only in a suit against the Government, or against a public officer for an act in his official capacity

What it fixes

When limitation begins, where the suit may be filed, and what must be pleaded and proved

When the suit may be instituted: not before two months from delivery of the notice

Relationship

It exists whether or not notice is given

It must STATE the cause of action, so it presupposes one

If it is missing

The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a)

The plaint is rejected as barred by law under Order VII Rule 11(d), the condition precedent not being satisfied

If it is defective

The plaint may be amended under Order VI Rule 17 where the real question is unaffected

Section 80(3): the suit is not dismissed merely for an error or defect, if the plaintiff is identifiable, the notice was delivered at the proper office, and the cause of action and relief are substantially indicated

Can it be dispensed with?

No

Yes: Section 80(2), with the leave of the court, for urgent or immediate relief

Effect on limitation

Time runs from its accrual

Section 15(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963: the notice period is EXCLUDED in computing limitation

4. Why the Notice Exists

§ The object, and the two provisions that reflect it

The object. To give the Government or the public officer an opportunity to reconsider the matter and, if the claim is just, to settle it without litigation, saving public money and the court's time.

That object explains Section 80(3). Since the purpose is to inform, a notice that achieves it is good enough, and the suit is not dismissed for an error or defect where the plaintiff is identifiable, the notice reached the proper office, and the cause of action and relief were substantially indicated.

And it explains Section 80(2). Where the relief sought is urgent or immediate, the object cannot be served by a two-month wait, so the court may grant leave to sue at once, subject to the requirement that no relief is granted without giving the other side a reasonable opportunity to show cause.

It does not, however, make the notice optional. Where sub-section (2) is not invoked, the requirement is a condition precedent, and a suit filed before the two months expire is not maintainable.

5. Practical Points

i. The plaint must say so. Section 80(1) requires the plaint to contain a statement that the notice has been delivered or left at the proper office.

ii. The notice must match the suit. The cause of action and the relief claimed in the suit must correspond to what was notified; a suit on a materially different footing is not saved by the earlier notice.

iii. Two months, not sixty days from any other date. The period runs from the delivery of the notice, and the suit may be instituted after its expiration.

iv. Limitation is protected. Section 15(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes the period of notice in computing the limitation period, so a plaintiff does not lose time by complying.

v. Leave under sub-section (2) is not a formality. The court applies its mind to whether the relief is urgent or immediate, and the proviso prevents any relief being granted without hearing the other side.

6. Landmark Points

- Section 80(1). No suit against the Government or a public officer for an official act until two months after notice stating the cause of action, the plaintiff's name, description and residence, and the relief claimed.

- The plaint must state that notice was delivered.

- Section 80(2). A suit for urgent or immediate relief may be instituted with the leave of the court without notice, but no relief is granted without a reasonable opportunity to show cause.

- Section 80(3). No dismissal merely for an error or defect in the notice, where the plaintiff is identifiable, the notice reached the proper office, and the cause of action and relief are substantially indicated.

- Section 15(2), Limitation Act, 1963. The notice period is excluded in computing limitation.

- A cause of action is substantive and exists independently; the notice is procedural and presupposes it.

7. Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a cause of action and a Section 80 notice?

A cause of action is the bundle of facts the plaintiff must prove to obtain a judgment; it is substantive and exists whether or not any notice is given. A Section 80 notice is a procedural condition precedent to suing the Government or a public officer, and it must state the cause of action.

What must a Section 80 notice contain?

The cause of action, the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff, and the relief which he claims. It must be delivered to or left at the office of the authority named in the section, and the plaint must state that this has been done.

Can a suit be filed without notice?

Yes, under Section 80(2), with the leave of the court, where the suit is to obtain urgent or immediate relief. But the court shall not grant any relief, interim or otherwise, without giving the Government or the public officer a reasonable opportunity of showing cause.

Is a defective notice fatal?

Not necessarily. Section 80(3) provides that a suit shall not be dismissed merely by reason of an error or defect in the notice, if the plaintiff was identifiable, the notice was delivered at the proper office, and the cause of action and the relief claimed were substantially indicated.

Does the notice period eat into limitation?

No. Section 15(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes the period of the notice in computing the period of limitation, so a plaintiff who complies with Section 80 does not lose time by doing so.

What happens if a suit is filed before the two months expire?

It is premature. The requirement is a condition precedent, and the plaint is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) as barred by law, unless leave has been obtained under Section 80(2).

8. Related Topics in This CPC Series

- Section 80: Notice Before Suing the Government

- Suits by or Against the Government: Sections 79 to 82 and Order XXVII

- Order VII: The Plaint, Return and Rejection

- Place of Suing: Sections 15 to 20